Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Muscle architecture and control demands.

C Gans1, A S Gaunt

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1048.

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ulcerative stomatitis associated with yellow bristle grass in New Zealand dairy cows.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2024
Same author

Usage pattern of the complex masticatory muscles in the shingleback lizard, Trachydosaurus rugosus: A model for muscle placement.

The American journal of anatomy·2010
Same author

Twenty-five novel HLA-B alleles.

Tissue antigens·2003
Same author

Mechanical significance of obliquely striated architecture in nematode muscle.

The Biological bulletin·1998
Same author

Mechanisms of tongue protraction and narial closure in the marine toad Bufo marinus.

The Journal of experimental biology·1996
Same author

The role of hypoglossal sensory feedback during feeding in the marine toad, Bufo marinus.

The Journal of experimental zoology·1992

Understanding muscle architecture is key to explaining locomotion. Research highlights challenges in analyzing myofiber, motor unit, and muscle arrangements, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to solve these complex biomechanical puzzles.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Comparative Anatomy
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Locomotion relies on complex muscle architecture, presenting significant analytical challenges.
  • Understanding the arrangement of myofibers, motor units, and muscles around joints is crucial for explaining movement.
  • Existing knowledge gaps exist in the intermediate architecture, including compartmentation and pinnation, and the functional equivalence of morphologically distinct muscles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address analytical problems in gross muscle architecture related to locomotion.
  • To clarify the relationship between morphological differences and functional roles of muscles.
  • To explore the interplay between muscle fiber arrangement and the control system.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of myofiber and motor unit arrangements within muscles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of muscle placement, attachment, and angulation around joints.
  • Investigating macroscopic and intermediate muscle architecture, including compartmentation, pinnation, and concatenation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified challenges in analyzing muscle fiber and motor unit arrangements.
    • Highlighted the complexity of muscle arrangements around joints and their impact on locomotion.
    • Noted that morphologically distinct muscles can be functionally equivalent, complicating analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research is needed to fully appreciate the opportunities and limitations imposed by muscle architecture on the control system.
    • Interdisciplinary collaboration among neurobiologists, developmental biologists, physiologists, and morphologists is essential for advancing our understanding of muscle function.
    • Solving the analytical problems in muscle gross architecture requires a comprehensive approach integrating multiple biological disciplines.