Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Instructor and course evaluation based on student-identified criteria.

M O Jackson

    The Journal of Nursing Education
    |February 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Student feedback is crucial for educational quality. Implementing standardized evaluation tools ensures objective assessment and fosters communication between students and faculty for improved learning experiences.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Transplant assessment.

    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2016
    Same author

    Inhibition of human lymphoproliferative responses and altered lymphocyte membrane phenotype by succinylacetone.

    Immunopharmacology·1992
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Assessment
    • Pedagogy
    • Higher Education

    Background:

    • Students possess the inherent right to evaluate their educational experiences.
    • Current practices may not consistently facilitate student feedback.
    • Objective evaluation is essential for educational improvement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for a systematic approach to student evaluations.
    • To propose a standardized instrument for consistent assessment.
    • To enhance faculty-student communication regarding educational quality.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a mutually agreed-upon evaluation instrument.
    • Universal application of the evaluation form across all courses.
    • Encouraging student participation through regular questionnaires.

    Main Results:

    • Standardized evaluations promote greater objectivity in assessing instructors and courses.
    • Consistent feedback provides valuable insights into personal performance and course delivery.
    • Increased student engagement in the evaluation process.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized student evaluations are vital for ensuring educational quality.
    • Faculty must actively consider student feedback in instructional and curricular decisions.
    • Effective communication channels between faculty and students are key to mutual responsibility and needs fulfillment.

    Related Experiment Videos