Related Experiment Videos
Who completes seven-day food records?
1Glostrup Population Studies, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
|October 1, 1992
Summary
This study characterized participants for a 7-day food record. Older individuals, women, and non-smokers were more likely to respond, with no significant dietary differences found between respondents and non-respondents.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Understanding participant characteristics in dietary studies is crucial for generalizability.
- Dietary assessment methods, like food records, rely on participant compliance.
- The Glostrup Population Studies aimed to gather long-term health data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the demographic and lifestyle factors of individuals who completed a 7-day food record.
- To compare respondents and non-respondents in a large population-based sample.
Main Methods:
- An age- and sex-stratified random sample of 4807 individuals born in 1922, 1932, 1942, and 1952 were invited.
- Participants completed a 7-day food record, with response rates analyzed by age, sex, marital status, education, smoking, and alcohol consumption.
- Food consumption patterns were compared between respondents and non-respondents using a food frequency questionnaire.
Main Results:
- A 49.2% response rate was achieved for the 7-day food record.
- Higher response rates were observed in older age groups, among women, and in individuals who had never smoked or had quit smoking.
- Male respondents consumed less beer weekly; no significant dietary differences were found between respondents and non-respondents.
Conclusions:
- Participant characteristics, including age, sex, and smoking status, influence response rates in dietary surveys.
- While certain groups were more likely to participate, the overall dietary intake did not significantly differ between those who provided records and those who did not.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering response bias in population-based dietary research.