Related Experiment Videos

Comparative study of oral versus injectable vitamin K in neonates

S Malik1, R H Udani, S K Bichile

  • 1Department of Pediatrics and Hematology, T.N.M. College, Bombay.

Indian Pediatrics
|July 1, 1992
PubMed

Insights

Oral Vitamin K is as effective as injectable Vitamin K for preventing hemorrhagic disease of newborn (HDN). This study recommends oral Vitamin K due to its comparable efficacy and lower cost.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Neonatology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Hemorrhagic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a preventable condition.
  • Vitamin K prophylaxis is standard for newborns.
  • Different administration routes and doses of Vitamin K are used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of various Vitamin K administration modes and doses.
  • To compare intramuscular versus oral Vitamin K for preventing HDN.
  • To determine the optimal Vitamin K regimen for exclusively breastfed infants.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 100 exclusively breastfed infants weighing over 2.5 kg.
  • Infants were divided into four groups: 1 mg IM Vitamin K, 0.5 mg IM Vitamin K, 1 mg oral Vitamin K, and no Vitamin K.
  • Prothrombin index was measured between 36-72 hours of age.

Main Results:

  • Infants receiving Vitamin K (Groups A, B, C) showed significantly higher prothrombin indices compared to the no-Vitamin K group (Group D).
  • Prothrombin indices for 1 mg IM, 0.5 mg IM, and 1 mg oral Vitamin K were statistically similar.
  • The no-Vitamin K group exhibited a significantly reduced prothrombin index (80.39 +/- 15.90%).

Conclusions:

  • Oral Vitamin K is as effective as intramuscular Vitamin K in preventing hemorrhagic disease of the newborn.
  • The study recommends oral Vitamin K administration to reduce complications and costs associated with parenteral therapy.
  • Vitamin K prophylaxis is crucial for exclusively breastfed infants to maintain adequate coagulation.

Related Concept Videos