Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validity issues in split-mouth trials.

P P Hujoel1, T A DeRouen

  • 1Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Journal of Clinical Periodontology
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Free sugars and gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2023
Same author

Our Essential and Endangered Dentist-Scientist Workforce.

JDR clinical and translational research·2019
Same author

Phenotypic characteristics of adolescents with concave and convex facial profiles - The National Health Examination Survey.

Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen·2016
Same author

Promises and Pitfalls in the Use of "Big Data" for Clinical Research.

Journal of dental research·2015
Same author

What are the cancer risks from dental computed tomography?

Journal of dental research·2014
Same author

Critique of reanalysis of Casa Pia data on associations of porphyrins and glutathione-S-transferases with dental amalgam exposure.

Human & experimental toxicology·2014

The split-mouth design enhances statistical power by comparing treatments within patients. However, potential carry-across effects can bias treatment efficacy estimates, requiring careful consideration of validity versus precision.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Split-mouth designs reduce inter-subject variability by performing within-patient comparisons.
  • This design aims to increase statistical power and reduce error variance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the split-mouth design in clinical trials.
  • To highlight the potential bias introduced by carry-across effects.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the statistical properties of the split-mouth design.
  • It contrasts within-patient comparisons with between-patient comparisons.

Main Results:

  • Split-mouth designs can increase statistical test power by minimizing subject-specific variance.
  • Carry-across effects, where a treatment influences unintended experimental units, cannot be estimated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The estimable parameter combines treatment effects and carry-across effects, potentially biasing efficacy results.

    • Conclusions:

    • Estimates of treatment efficacy in split-mouth studies may be biased if carry-across effects are present.
    • Researchers must balance the potential precision gains against the risk of decreased validity in split-mouth trial design.