Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

C Fagot1, H Pashler

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates the central attentional bottleneck, identifying response selection as a key factor. Findings suggest the bottleneck isn't due to processing one object at a time but rather a limitation within response selection itself.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

Consciousness and cognition·2001
Same author

Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human attention research

Background:

  • Previous research identified a central attentional bottleneck, primarily localized in response selection.
  • The underlying causes of this bottleneck, particularly in dual-task scenarios, remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind the central attentional bottleneck.
  • To differentiate between object-based limitations and response-selection limitations in dual-task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved participants performing two responses to different aspects of the same object.
  • Further experiments examined dual responses to the same attribute of a single object.
  • Interference patterns between response selections were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Response selection interference persisted even when participants responded to different object aspects.
  • When responding to the same attribute, only one response selection occurred.
  • These results rule out a bottleneck caused by processing only one object at a time.

Conclusions:

  • The central attentional bottleneck is not limited by the processing of a single object.
  • The bottleneck appears to stem from limitations within the response selection mechanism itself.
  • Further theoretical exploration of the bottleneck's nature is warranted.