Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surface perception in pictures.

J J Koenderink1, A J van Doorn, A M Kappers

  • 1Utrecht Biophysics Research Institute, The Netherlands.

Perception & Psychophysics
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Method of stabilizing the retinal image.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

[An animal in need: trespassers are strictly handled].

Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde·2009
Same author

Spatiotemporal contrast detection threshold surface is bimodal.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Do reference surfaces influence exocentric pointing?

Acta psychologica·2008
Same author

Optical properties (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) of shot fabric.

Applied optics·2008
Same author

Surface roughness from highlight structure.

Applied optics·2008

Participants adjusted visual cues to match perceived object surfaces in photos. While individual settings were consistent, observers showed significant differences in perceived slant, suggesting subjective interpretations of 3D space.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Psychophysics
  • 3D Surface Orientation

Background:

  • Understanding how humans perceive and represent 3D surface orientation from 2D images is crucial in fields like computer vision and virtual reality.
  • Previous research has explored depth perception and surface properties, but the precise mechanisms of adjusting local cues to global surface perception remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how subjects perceptually adjust local visual cues to match the apparent surfaces of objects in photographs.
  • To quantify the variability and agreement among observers in estimating surface slant and tilt from pictorial representations.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects adjusted a local gauge figure to align with perceived object surfaces in photographs, with data collected on a uniform lattice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Settings for slant and tilt were repeated three times for each of three subjects to assess reliability and variability.

    • Main Results:

    • Variability in perceived surface orientation was primarily attributed to slant (approx. 25% Weber fraction), while tilt showed less variability (approx. 10 degrees).
    • High rank correlation between subjects indicated monotonic relationships in slant settings, but significant inter-observer disagreement in absolute slant values was observed.
    • Individual observer scatter accounted for all observed variability, with scaling factors up to a doubling in depth perception between subjects.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceptual adjustments of local cues align with a hypothetical global surface, but individual interpretations lead to significant differences in perceived slant.
    • The study highlights the subjective nature of 3D surface perception from 2D images, emphasizing observer-specific variability over veridicality.