[Hemostasis screening in the emergency laboratory]

While automation of laboratories is of great value for analysts, as it makes technical work easier, and for clinicians, as the results are available in a shorter time, the requests increase strikingly bringing about higher costs. The emergency laboratory is an example of what happens in the general laboratory. In order to make an estimate of this subject, the haemostasis screening was chosen since it is a recently automated technique in that laboratory, attention being paid to the aim and indication of the screening and its economical burden.

A study of the haemostasis screening performed during July 1990 was carried out of considering the 24 hours per day work. The requests were classified, in accordance with their indication, as diagnostic, pre-surgical, therapeutic or unknown; the justification and purpose of those requests was also examined.

The total number of studies performed in that month was 1,273, with a daily mean of 41, as opposed to 2,095 performed in the haemostasis laboratory in the same period. According to the American Medical Association criteria only 48% of the requests could be warranted, and abnormal findings appeared in only 10% of them.

The cost per isolated parameter is low, but it increases greatly when compared with the benefit that it reports to the patient because, as those biological tests indirectly measure the concentration of clotting factors, they are subjected to error when performed by non-specialized personnel; on the other hand, the most valuable information for detecting haemorrhagic troubles comes from the patient's history. The economical burden in the month studied amounted to 985,879 PTA; one year later, the same laboratory, in the same month, had a 50% increase of studies.