Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[The comparative characteristics of mastication tests].

A N Riakhovskiĭ

    Stomatologiia
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compared mastication tests, finding the author's test most sensitive and accurate for assessing chewing function, even with minor dental issues. Repeated testing improved reliability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Manual instruments for ledge polishing by tooth preparation for crown].

    Stomatologiia·2014
    Same author

    [Comparative study of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry].

    Stomatologiia·2014
    Same author

    [Method of customized analysis of tension deformities in fixed dental restorations].

    Stomatologiia·2013
    Same author

    [Estimation of impression quality in fixed prosthesis oral rehabilitation].

    Stomatologiia·2013
    Same author

    [Clinical case of cable-stayed bridge manufactured by means of CAD/CAM technology].

    Stomatologiia·2012
    Same author

    [Soft tissue contour changes in restorative rehabilitation by complete dentures].

    Stomatologiia·2012

    Area of Science:

    • Dentistry
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Oral Health

    Background:

    • Mastication tests are crucial for evaluating chewing efficiency.
    • Standardized and reliable mastication tests are needed for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
    • Existing mastication tests may have limitations in sensitivity and accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the reliability and accuracy of different mastication tests, including Manley's, Rubinov's, and the author's.
    • To analyze the pattern of changes in mastication test data with minor dentition defects.
    • To formulate basic requirements for an effective mastication test.

    Main Methods:

    • Subjects with intact dentition and orthognathic occlusion underwent repeated measurements (3 times, 2-3 weeks apart) of Manley's, Rubinov's, and the author's mastication tests.
    • Correlations between Dahlberg's, Manley's, Rubinov's, and the author's test data were analyzed.
    • The performance of the tests was evaluated in the presence of minor dentition defects.

    Main Results:

    • Repeated testing demonstrated improved results and reliability.
    • Data from various mastication tests showed incompatibility, highlighting discrepancies in measurement.
    • The author's suggested mastication test proved to be the most sensitive and accurate among those evaluated.
    • The study identified specific patterns of change in test data associated with minor dentition defects.

    Conclusions:

    • The author's mastication test is recommended for its superior sensitivity and accuracy in assessing chewing function.
    • Repeated measurements enhance the reliability of mastication test outcomes.
    • Inconsistencies among existing tests necessitate the development and validation of more robust methods.
    • Key requirements for an optimal mastication test have been defined based on this comparative analysis.

    Related Experiment Videos