Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

AxAudit--anaesthetic audit system.

G P Ramayya1

  • 1Department of Anaesthetics, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, UK.

International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2001
Same author

Training nursing staff in airway management for resuscitation. A clinical comparison of the facemask and laryngeal mask.

Anaesthesia·1993
Same author

Continuous collection of pulse oximetry data: a new, inexpensive, portable computerized method.

British journal of anaesthesia·1992
Same author

Multi-mode switchable breathing systems.

Anaesthesia·1985
Same author

Self-administered isoflurane in labour. A comparative study with Entonox.

Anaesthesia·1985
Same journal

Computerized monitoring of potentially interfering medication in thyroid function diagnostics.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
Same journal

Retest-reliability and convergent validity of noninvasive blood pressure determination: arm sphygmomanometry vs. Peñaz-method.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
Same journal

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
Same journal

Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
Same journal

Design and implementation of a PC-based data acquisition system for measuring ECG and respiratory signals.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
Same journal

The inspiratory to end-tidal oxygen difference during exercise.

International journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1998
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study introduces AxSys Anaesthetic Audit (AxAudit), a bar code system for anesthesia data. It streamlines data capture and analysis, improving patient record completeness and audit efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Auditing

Background:

  • Traditional anesthetic record-keeping is prone to errors and inefficiencies.
  • Manual data transfer from forms to computer systems is time-consuming and can lead to data loss.
  • Effective clinical audits require comprehensive and accurate patient data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a novel bar code-based computerized anesthetic audit system.
  • To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of anesthetic data collection and analysis.
  • To facilitate comprehensive patient record keeping within normal clinical workflows.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a bar code-based system (AxSys Anaesthetic Audit - AxAudit).
  • Utilizing a hand-held computer with a data entry and validation module.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing a central desktop database for extensive data analysis, graphing, and reporting.
  • Automated data transfer via data cards inserted into a desktop reader.
  • Main Results:

    • The system ensures a minimum data set is captured for every patient.
    • Direct data entry at the point of care minimizes errors and improves record completeness.
    • Automated data transfer enhances efficiency and reduces manual transcription issues.
    • The system facilitates extensive data analysis and reporting for effective auditing.

    Conclusions:

    • The AxSys Anaesthetic Audit system offers an efficient and accurate method for anesthetic record-keeping.
    • Bar code technology integration improves data quality and audit capabilities in anesthesiology.
    • This system supports comprehensive patient data management and facilitates effective clinical audits.