Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

K N Apelgren1, R G Molnar, J M Kisala

  • 1Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.

Surgical Endoscopy
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Portal vein thrombosis.

Surgical endoscopy·2003
Same author

The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2001
Same author

"Terminal" wean is the wrong term.

Critical care medicine·2000
Same author

Are radially dilating trocars better than the alternatives?

Surgical endoscopy·2000
Same author

Successful repair of blunt cardiac rupture involving both ventricles.

Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)·1999
Same author

Vertebral artery surgery.

The Surgical clinics of North America·1999
Same journal

Impact of the fibrosis-4 index on postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Advanced robotic liver surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy shows no clear advantage over open surgery in early patient outcomes. While minimally invasive, it requires longer operating times and further research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is gaining traction as a minimally invasive surgical option.
  • Surgeons are increasingly adopting new techniques to improve patient recovery.
  • The effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy compared to traditional methods requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy.
  • To assess the early experience and feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • To evaluate key metrics including cost, hospital stay, infection rates, and operative time.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 38 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • Comparison with a cohort of patients who underwent open appendectomy during the same period.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of hospital costs, length of hospital stay, wound infection rates, and operating room time.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were observed in hospital costs, length of stay, or wound infection rates between the two surgical approaches.
    • Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a significantly longer operating room time compared to open appendectomy.
    • Early results suggest the laparoscopic approach is not definitively superior despite theoretical benefits.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy, while minimally invasive, does not demonstrate clear superiority over open appendectomy in early outcomes.
    • Longer operative times for the laparoscopic approach require further investigation and potential improvements.
    • Development of newer instruments and further clinical studies are necessary to optimize laparoscopic appendectomy techniques and confirm its benefits.