Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Systematic modelling in nutrition].

D Sauvant1

  • 1Institut national agronomique Paris-Grignon, station de nutrition et alimentation (INRA), Paris.

Reproduction, Nutrition, Development
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of predicted ration nutritional values by NRC (2001) and INRA (2018) feed evaluation systems, and implications for the prediction of milk response.

Journal of dairy science·2020
Same author

Review: Use and misuse of meta-analysis in Animal Science.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2020
Same author

Net hepatic release of glucose from precursor supply in ruminants: a meta-analysis.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2020
Same author

Repeatability of traits for characterizing feed intake patterns in dairy goats: a basis for phenotyping in the precision farming context.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2019
Same author

A new Tier 3 method to calculate methane emission inventory for ruminants.

Journal of environmental management·2019
Same author

Review: Converting nutritional knowledge into feeding practices: a case study comparing different protein feeding systems for dairy cows.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2018
Same journal

Rates and efficiencies of reactions of ruminal biohydrogenation of linoleic acid according to pH and polyunsaturated fatty acids concentrations.

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
Same journal

Effect of silage type and concentrate level on conjugated linoleic acids, trans-C18:1 isomers and fat content in milk from dairy cows.

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
Same journal

Body size versus gonad maturation form in under-yearling precocious males of the sea trout (Salmo trutta m. trutta L.).

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
Same journal

Performance and behaviour of rabbit does in a group-housing system with natural mating or artificial insemination.

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
Same journal

Effect of different levels and sources of zinc supplementation on quantitative and qualitative semen attributes and serum testosterone level in crossbred cattle (Bos indicus x Bos taurus) bulls.

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
Same journal

Positive correlation between the body weight of anestrous goats and their response to the male effect with sexually active bucks.

Reproduction, nutrition, development·2006
See all related articles

This review explores applying systems modeling to nutrition, simplifying complex nutritional systems. It compares different nutritional models and discusses their application in research.

Area of Science:

  • Nutrition science
  • Systems biology
  • Biomathematics

Background:

  • Living organisms function as open systems maintaining a steady state via nutritional processes.
  • Applying a systemic approach to nutrition modeling is feasible but underexplored.
  • Nutritional systems involve complex components requiring simplification for effective analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the complexity of nutritional systems.
  • To present methods for simplifying nutritional system analysis.
  • To compare various modeling approaches applicable to nutrition.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of empirical vs. mechanistic models.
  • Comparison of static vs. dynamic models.
  • Discussion of modeling regulatory systems like homeostasis and homeorhesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of model validation and application.
  • Main Results:

    • Nutritional processes can be conceptualized and modeled using systems approaches.
    • Different model types (empirical, mechanistic, static, dynamic) offer distinct advantages for nutritional analysis.
    • Understanding regulatory mechanisms (homeostasis, homeorhesis) is crucial for accurate nutritional modeling.

    Conclusions:

    • Systems modeling provides a valuable framework for understanding complex nutritional processes.
    • The choice of model depends on the specific research question and system complexity.
    • Further research and application of these models can advance nutritional science.