Related Experiment Videos
Which questionnaires should be used in female urology practice?
1Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, 150 East 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016, USA. chris.kelly@msnyuhealth.org
Current Urology Reports
|September 23, 2003
Summary
Evaluating female pelvic floor disorders requires careful selection of subjective instruments. This study addresses the growing number of questionnaires and the need for refined criteria to aid clinical decision-making in female urology.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Female Pelvic Floor Disorders
Background:
- Female pelvic floor disorders represent a growing sub-specialty in urology.
- Treatment efficacy and durability are increasingly scrutinized.
- Questionnaires are vital subjective instruments for evaluating these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the proliferation of patient-reported outcome measures in female urology.
- To highlight the challenges practitioners face in selecting appropriate evaluation tools.
- To advocate for refined criteria for assessing questionnaire validity and utility.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on female pelvic floor disorder evaluation.
- Analysis of the landscape of available subjective assessment tools.
- Discussion of the implications for clinical practice and research.
Main Results:
- A significant increase in the number of available questionnaires for female pelvic floor disorders.
- Lack of standardized criteria for questionnaire selection.
- Challenges in determining the most effective and durable treatment options.
Conclusions:
- The selection of appropriate questionnaires is critical for accurate female pelvic floor disorder assessment.
- Development of refined evaluation criteria is necessary to guide practitioners.
- Further research is needed to establish best practices for subjective outcome measurement.