Appropriateness of invasive cardiovascular interventions in German hospitals (2000-2001): an evaluation using the

Afschin Gandjour1, Iris Neumann, Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach

  • 1Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Strasse 176-178, 50935 Cologne, Germany. afschin.gandjour@medizin.uni-koeln.de

Insights

German hospitals show low overt overuse of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs), coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs), and carotid endarterectomies (CEAs). However, there may be significant underuse of pre-interventional stress tests.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular medicine
  • Health services research
  • Medical procedure appropriateness

Background:

  • Germany exhibits high rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and heart surgeries.
  • Evaluating the appropriateness of invasive cardiovascular procedures is crucial for healthcare quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the appropriateness of PTCA, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in German hospitals.
  • To compare German procedure rates with international benchmarks.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study involving 121 randomly selected German hospitals.
  • Analysis of 361 patient cases, including 128 PTCAs, 92 CABGs, and 141 CEAs.
  • Utilized RAND appropriateness criteria for evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Low inappropriateness rates: 2% for PTCA, 4% for CABG, and 3% for CEA.
  • A high rate of uncertain procedures (42%) was observed.
  • Only 38% of patients undergoing coronary intervention had a pre-interventional stress test.

Conclusions:

  • Minimal overt overuse of PTCA, CABG, and CEA in Germany.
  • Potential underuse of pre-interventional stress tests requires attention.
  • Inappropriate procedure rates are comparable to other countries despite high intervention rates.
Abstract