Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative?

Jason G Mezey1, David Houle

  • 1Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-1100, USA. mezey@bio.fsu.edu

Genetics
|September 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AAVrh.10hFXN Gene Therapy for the Cardiomyopathy of Friedreich Ataxia: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA cardiology·2026
Same author

Behavior evolves as a correlated response to selection on cuticle color in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same author

Impact of population-specific pharmacogenomic variants on drug dosing in ICU patients.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2026
Same author

Resource stewardship learning needs in undergraduate medical training: a cross-sectional study.

MedEdPublish (2016)·2026
Same author

Evolvability: progress and key questions.

Bioscience·2025
Same author

Regularized regression can improve estimates of multivariate selection in the face of multicollinearity and limited data.

Evolution letters·2024
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Common principal components (CPCs) reveal shared genetic architecture when populations exhibit modular pleiotropy. This indicates that CPCs in additive genetic variance-covariance matrices (G) signify common modular organization, not general similarity.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Quantitative genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Additive genetic variance-covariance matrices (G) describe the genetic basis of trait evolution.
  • Comparing G matrices across populations can reveal evolutionary constraints and similarities.
  • Common principal components (CPCs) analysis is a method to assess structural similarity between matrices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive the theoretical conditions under which G matrices are expected to share common principal components (CPCs).
  • To investigate the relationship between modularity in pleiotropic effects and the presence of common CPCs in G matrices.
  • To clarify the interpretation of common CPCs when applied to estimated G matrices.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical derivation using a two-locus, two-allele model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical derivation using a model of constrained pleiotropy.
  • Analysis of conditions determining the presence of common CPCs based on pleiotropic organization and allele frequencies.

    • Main Results:

    • Common CPCs in G matrices are primarily determined by the presence of modular organization in pleiotropic effects.
    • If populations share modules with the same direction, common CPCs are expected regardless of allele frequencies.
    • In the absence of modularity, common CPCs are only found under very specific allele frequency combinations.
    • Common CPCs in G matrices indicate shared modular organization, not general similarity.

    Conclusions:

    • Additive genetic variance-covariance matrices (G) generally do not share common principal components (CPCs).
    • The presence of common CPCs in G matrices is a strong indicator of common modular organization in pleiotropic effects between populations.
    • Understanding modularity is crucial for interpreting the evolutionary implications of comparing G matrices using CPC analysis.