Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tomographic plaque imaging with CT: technical considerations and capabilities.

John A Rumberger1

  • 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
|September 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Race- and Sex-Specific Age at Which Coronary Artery Calcium Becomes Detectable Among Young Adults.

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging·2025
Same author

Risk Profile and Prognostic Implications of Premature Advanced Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease Among Young to Early Middle-aged Adults: The Coronary Artery Calcium Consortium.

European journal of preventive cardiology·2025
Same author

Coronary Artery Calcium for Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Mortality: The Coronary Artery Calcium Consortium.

Journal of cardiac failure·2024
Same author

Coronary Artery Calcium for Risk Stratification Among Persons With Very High HDL Cholesterol.

JACC. Advances·2024
Same author

Left Main Coronary Artery Calcium and Diabetes Confer Very-High-Risk Equivalence in Coronary Artery Calcium >1,000.

JACC. Cardiovascular imaging·2024
Same author

Coronary artery calcium for stroke mortality prediction.

Vascular medicine (London, England)·2024
Same journal

Beyond therapeutic maximalism: Prioritization and personalization in preventive therapies.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Multimodality imaging of vulnerable plaque: Are we there yet? A multifaceted perspective.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Beyond LDL-C: Triangulating residual risk via lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, and vascular inflammation.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

COVID-19 and coronary atherosclerosis: Unmasking and accelerating?

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Mavacamten and left ventricular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Lessons from ATTR-CM clinical trials: Progress, persistent disparities, and emerging treatment dilemmas.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
See all related articles

X-ray computed tomography (CT) offers high-definition imaging for quantifying coronary artery calcification, a marker for atherosclerotic plaque. Different CT scanner types, like electron beam tomography (EBT) and multidetector CT (MDCT), have distinct technical capabilities affecting calcium scoring precision.

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Cardiovascular diagnostics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • X-ray computed tomography (CT) provides high-definition, thin-section imaging capabilities for various body parts.
  • Coronary calcification, a surrogate for coronary artery atheromatous plaque, can be quantified using CT.
  • Electron beam tomography (EBT) and multidetector CT (MDCT) are established methods for assessing coronary calcification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the technical aspects and methodological differences between CT scanner types used for coronary calcium scoring.
  • To compare the precision of calcium scoring based on the technical capabilities and limitations of EBT and MDCT scanners.

Main Methods:

  • Review of technical aspects of X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners, specifically Electron Beam Tomography (EBT) and Multidetector CT (MDCT).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors influencing the precision of coronary calcium scoring across different CT modalities.
  • Discussion of the clinical reference standard for noninvasive assessment of atherosclerotic plaque.

    • Main Results:

    • Methodological differences exist between EBT and MDCT scanners, impacting calcium scoring precision.
    • The precision of calcium scoring is directly related to the technical capabilities and limitations of the specific CT scanner used.
    • While MDCT has advanced, EBT is highlighted as the clinical reference standard for noninvasive atherosclerotic plaque definition.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the technical differences between CT scanner types is crucial for accurate coronary calcium scoring.
    • EBT remains the gold standard for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery atheromatous plaque, despite MDCT improvements.
    • CT technology offers valuable tools for quantifying coronary calcification and assessing cardiovascular risk.