Related Experiment Videos
Clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibilities to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime
James A Karlowsky1, Mark E Jones, Deborah C Draghi
1Focus Technologies, Herndon, Virginia 20171, USA. jkarlowsky@foucustechnologies.com
Abstract:
Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are extended-spectrum cephalosporins previously demonstrated to possess very similar in vitro activities against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Anecdotal reports of isolates with divergent in vitro susceptibilities to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime have been published. To determine the prevalence of pneumococcal isolates with divergent ceftriaxone and cefotaxime susceptibilities, we tested 1,000 clinical isolates collected by U.S. laboratories in 2001-2002 by broth microdilution and E-test. The percentages of isolates susceptible to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were significantly different by both broth microdilution (98.6 and 96.6%, respectively; P < 0.05) and E-test (98.3 and 95.8%; P < 0.001). The differences observed were due solely to the activities of the two agents against penicillin-resistant isolates. Twenty-six of 188 penicillin-resistant isolates (13.8%) demonstrated different ceftriaxone and cefotaxime MIC interpretative phenotypes when tested by broth microdilution; 18 isolates were concurrently ceftriaxone susceptible and cefotaxime intermediate, 6 were ceftriaxone intermediate and cefotaxime resistant, and 2 were ceftriaxone susceptible and cefotaxime resistant (1.1% of penicillin-resistant isolates; 0.2% of all isolates tested). Sixteen of the 26 isolates (65%) were from southern U.S. states. The 26 isolates had serogroups and serotypes (6, 9, 14, 19, and 23) commonly associated with penicillin-resistant isolates; SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 18 isolates (69%) dispersed among five subtype groups and 8 isolates that were unrelated to any of the other isolates. We conclude that certain isolates of penicillin-resistant pneumococci are less susceptible to cefotaxime than to ceftriaxone and that these isolates are not the result of the spread of a single clone. Whether such isolates have increased in prevalence over time remains unknown.
Insights
Certain penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains show lower susceptibility to cefotaxime than ceftriaxone. This divergence in antibiotic susceptibility is not attributed to a single clone
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are extended-spectrum cephalosporins with similar in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae.
- Previous anecdotal reports suggest varying susceptibilities of pneumococcal isolates to these two antibiotics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with differing in vitro susceptibilities to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime.
- To investigate the characteristics of pneumococcal isolates exhibiting divergent ceftriaxone and cefotaxime susceptibility phenotypes.
Main Methods:
- Tested 1,000 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in U.S. laboratories between 2001-2002.
- Utilized broth microdilution and E-test methods to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
- Analyzed susceptibility differences, particularly in penicillin-resistant isolates, and employed SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for genetic relatedness assessment.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference in susceptibility rates was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime for the tested pneumococcal isolates using both methods.
- Differences were primarily noted in penicillin-resistant isolates, with 13.8% showing divergent MIC interpretative phenotypes.
- A subset of these resistant isolates (1.1% of all penicillin-resistant isolates) displayed reduced susceptibility to cefotaxime compared to ceftriaxone, with no evidence of a single dominant clone.
Conclusions:
- Certain penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates exhibit decreased susceptibility to cefotaxime relative to ceftriaxone.
- The observed divergence in susceptibility is not linked to the clonal spread of a specific strain.
- Further research is needed to ascertain the temporal trends and clinical implications of this differential susceptibility.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence