Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual discrimination.

Lawrence E Marks1, Elisheva Ben-Artzi, Stephen Lakatos

  • 1John B Pierce Laboratory and Yale University, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. marks@jbpierce.org

International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
|September 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The contribution of school climate, socioeconomic status, ethnocultural affiliation, and school level to language arts scores: A multilevel moderated mediation model.

Journal of school psychology·2024
Same author

Reflections on Cross-Modal Correspondences: Current Understanding and Issues for Future Research.

Multisensory research·2023
Same author

Loneliness in Intimate Relationships Scale (LIRS): Development and Validation.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022
Same author

The contribution of driving with friends to young drivers' intention to take risks: An expansion of the theory of planned behavior.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2020
Same author

Interactions of Lemon, Sucrose and Citric Acid in Enhancing Citrus, Sweet and Sour Flavors.

Chemical senses·2018
Same author

Depression impairs the ability to ignore the emotional aspects of facial expressions: Evidence from the Garner task.

Cognition & emotion·2017
Same journal

Comparison of slow-paced breathing interventions with and without an inhalation-hold on physiological outcomes: A randomized cross-over pilot study.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

The role of inferior frontal gyrus in emotion regulation: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS investigation.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Trait anxiety in young adults is more consistently associated with resting-state EEG microstate transitions than with stationary spectral power.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neural modulation of emotional-word processing during the attentional blink under varying T1 task demands: An ERP study.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Attentional resource allocation in the early stages of motor skill learning.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Operation-specific ERP dynamics of arithmetic processing in children with developmental dyscalculia.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Auditory-visual interactions show modest effects, particularly visual input influencing hearing. However, these cross-modal influences appear to stem mainly from decision-making processes rather than sensory perception itself.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Understanding cross-modal interactions is crucial for explaining sensory integration.
  • Previous research suggests both sensory and decisional mechanisms may underlie these interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of auditory-visual interactions in sensory discrimination tasks.
  • To determine whether cross-modal effects arise from sensory processing or decisional factors.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using sensory discrimination paradigms.
  • A one-interval confidence-rating procedure and a two-interval same-different procedure were employed.
  • Auditory pitch, loudness, and visual brightness discrimination were assessed with and without concurrent stimulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Concurrent visual stimulation had modest effects on auditory discrimination, but auditory stimulation had little effect on visual discrimination.
  • No significant effect of visual stimulation on auditory sensitivity was found in one task.
  • Minimal auditory influence on visual sensitivity was observed.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that cross-modal interactions in these tasks are not primarily driven by sensory facilitation or inhibition.
  • The results point towards decisional processes, such as response bias, as the main contributors to observed auditory-visual interactions.