Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Adrian Edwards1, Silvana Unigwe, Glyn Elwyn
1Department of Primary Care, University of Wales Swansea Clinical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP. a.g.k.edwards@swan.ac.uk
Objective:
To assess the effects of different types of individualised risk communication for patients who are deciding whether to participate in screening.
Design:
Systematic review.
Data Sources:
Specialist register of the Cochrane consumers and communication review group, scientific databases, and a manual follow up of references.
Selection Of Studies:
Studies were randomised controlled trials addressing decisions by patients whether or not to undergo screening and incorporating an intervention with an element of "individualised" risk communication-based on the individual's own risk factors for a condition (such as age or family history).
Outcome Measures:
The principal outcome was uptake of screening tests; further cognitive and affective measures were also assessed to gauge informed decision making.
Results:
13 studies were included, 10 of which addressed mammography programmes. Individualised risk communication was associated with an increased uptake of screening tests (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.03). Few cognitive or affective outcomes were reported consistently, so it was not possible to conclude whether this increase in the uptake of tests was related to informed decision making by patients.
Conclusions:
Individualised risk estimates may be effective for purposes of population health, but their effects on increasing uptake of screening programmes may not be interpretable as evidence of informed decision making by patients. Greater attention is required to ways of developing interventions for screening programmes that can achieve this.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.