Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Late frontal brain potentials distinguish true and false recognition.

Rachel E Goldmann1, Alison L Sullivan, Daniel B J Droller

  • 1Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Neuroreport
|September 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impaired autobiographical remembering and future thinking in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2026
Same author

Reaction time as a performance validity measure in older adults with and without early-stage Alzheimer's disease.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2026
Same author

Subjective cognitive complaints and decline among aging individuals with prior repetitive head impact exposure.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Gaze patterns reveal attention-based modulation of lure discrimination.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Imaging the later-life white matter pathologies of repetitive head impacts: A novel pattern revealed through T2 FLAIR MRI.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Evaluating Alzheimer's disease with the TMS-EEG perturbation complexity index.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026

Brain potentials reveal distinct neural signatures for true and false recognition memory. A parietal component tracks recollection of gist, while a frontal component indicates effortful post-retrieval processing during memory tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Memory research distinguishes between accurate recall and false memories.
  • Understanding the neural basis of recognition memory is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the electrophysiological correlates of true and false recognition.
  • To identify distinct brain potential components associated with different recognition outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a recognition memory task.
  • Participants viewed categorized color photographs and made judgments about studied items, lures, and novel items.

Main Results:

  • A parietal ERP component showed increased positivity for true and false recognition compared to lure rejection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A later frontal ERP component was more positive for false recognition, lure rejection, and misses than for true recognition and novel item rejection.

    • Conclusions:

    • The parietal component may reflect the retrieval of gist-based representations from the study list.
    • The frontal component likely indicates the engagement of effortful post-retrieval monitoring or control processes.