Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A score test for binary data with patient non-compliance.

Michael Branson1, John Whitehead

  • 1Novartis Pharma AG, Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. michael.branson@pharma.novartis.com

Statistics in Medicine
|October 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elicitation of expert prior opinion to design the BARJDM trial in juvenile dermatomyositis.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Discussion on "The central role of the identifying assumption in population size estimation" by Serge Aleshin-Guendel, Mauricio Sadinle, and Jon Wakefield.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

Inverted laser sintering of metal powders.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Perspectives on valuing water quality improvements using stated preference methods.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2022
Same author

Efficient Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2021
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

A new score test accounts for patient non-compliance in binary clinical trials without losing statistical power compared to the intention-to-treat principle. This method provides accurate sample size calculations for trial design.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Patient non-compliance is a common issue in clinical trials, potentially affecting treatment effect estimation.
  • The intention-to-treat (ITT) principle is standard but may not fully account for compliance variations.
  • Developing statistical methods that incorporate compliance while maintaining randomization integrity is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a score test for binary clinical trial data that incorporates 'all-or-nothing' patient non-compliance.
  • To compare the performance of this adjusted score test with the standard intention-to-treat analysis.
  • To derive sample size formulae for trials using this compliance-adjusted method.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a score test statistic that adjusts for binary compliance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analytic comparison of the adjusted score test and likelihood ratio test statistics against their intention-to-treat counterparts.
  • Derivation of sample size formulae based on the adjusted methodology.
  • Simulation studies to validate the sample size approximations and test performance.

    • Main Results:

    • The adjusted score test was developed, considering 'all-or-nothing' compliance.
    • No gain in statistical power was observed when adjusting for non-compliance compared to the ITT principle.
    • The derived sample size formulae were shown to be accurate through simulations.

    Conclusions:

    • Adjusting for 'all-or-nothing' patient non-compliance in binary clinical trials does not increase statistical power over the intention-to-treat approach.
    • The developed score test and sample size formulae provide a valid statistical framework for trials with non-compliance.
    • The findings support the continued use of the ITT principle as a robust analysis strategy.