Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The usual suspects.

Gregory A Petsko1

  • 1Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA. petsko@brandeis.edu

Genome Biology
|October 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientists hesitate to report biohazardous material discrepancies or theft due to institutional or governmental concerns. This reluctance may impact safety protocols and regulatory compliance in research environments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evolving landscape of protein structure and molecular recognition.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same author

RhoGEF12 regulates endosomal SORL1-retromer and its inhibition is therapeutic in human neuronal models of Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The <i>SORL1</i> p.Y1816C variant causes impaired endosomal dimerization and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

RIOK2 transcriptionally regulates TRiC and dyskerin complexes to prevent telomere shortening.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Author Correction: CEACAM1 regulates TIM-3-mediated tolerance and exhaustion.

Nature·2024
Same author

On the causal role of retromer-dependent endosomal recycling in Alzheimer's disease.

Nature cell biology·2023

Area of Science:

  • Biosecurity
  • Scientific Ethics
  • Laboratory Management

Background:

  • Biohazardous materials require stringent handling and security protocols.
  • Reporting discrepancies or theft of these materials is crucial for maintaining safety and compliance.
  • Scientists may face repercussions for reporting such incidents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the factors influencing scientists' decisions to report or not report discrepancies or theft of biohazardous materials.
  • To understand the perceived risks and benefits associated with reporting such incidents.
  • To identify potential barriers to transparent reporting in scientific research.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative interviews with scientists across various disciplines.
  • Surveys assessing attitudes towards reporting procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of institutional policies on biosafety and material accountability.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant number of scientists expressed reluctance to report due to fear of institutional repercussions.
    • Perceived lack of effective reporting mechanisms and potential for blame were key deterrents.
    • Trust in institutional and governmental oversight varied considerably among participants.

    Conclusions:

    • Hesitancy in reporting biohazardous material mismanagement poses a risk to public health and research integrity.
    • Clearer, more supportive reporting channels are needed to encourage transparency.
    • Addressing scientists' concerns about reprisal is essential for improving biosecurity practices.