Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Barriers to interlock implementation.

Robert B Voas1, Paul R Marques

  • 1Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland 20705, USA. voas@pire.org

Traffic Injury Prevention
|October 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Convicted drinking and driving offenders: Comparing alcohol use before and after the pandemic outbreak.

Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research·2021
Same author

Understanding non-installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.

Drug and alcohol review·2021
Same author

Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal.

Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research·2021
Same author

Social Drinking Groups and Risk Experience in Nightclubs: Latent Class Analysis.

Health, risk & society·2018
Same author

Alcohol-Related Risk of Driver Fatalities in Motor Vehicle Crashes: Comparing Data From 2007 and 2013-2014.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2018
Same author

Methods for investigating crash risk: Comparing case-control with responsibility analysis.

Traffic injury prevention·2018
Same journal

Bicyclist overtaking in naturalistic riding data: Speed, clearance, and implications for injury risk.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same journal

Study of adaptation parameters of merging zones for freeway interchange ramps considering CAV & AV mixed traffic environments.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same journal

Behavioral determinants of motorcyclist personal protective equipment (PPE) use in five European cities.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same journal

Impact of grade designs of long mountainous freeway tunnel with crest vertical curve on traffic safety at tunnel portals.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same journal

Associations between blood ethanol concentration, clinical impairment test results, and traffic accident involvement among apprehended drivers.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same journal

Crash severity determinants in Saudi Arabia's Eastern Province: Evidence from logistic regression and neural networks.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
See all related articles

Vehicle interlock programs aim to reduce impaired driving. To increase participation, courts may need stricter sanctions for non-compliance, potentially combining ignition interlocks with electronic house arrest.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Criminology
  • Transportation Safety

Background:

  • Impaired driving remains a significant public safety concern.
  • Current vehicle interlock programs face challenges in widespread implementation for offenders.
  • Federal legislation mandates broader use of interlock devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review vehicle interlock programs for impaired driving offenders.
  • To identify challenges faced by courts and motor vehicle departments in program implementation.
  • To suggest strategies for increasing offender participation in interlock programs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current and past vehicle interlock programs.
  • Analysis of implementation challenges for courts and motor vehicle departments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of potential sanctions and program combinations.

    • Main Results:

    • Low offender participation rates in existing interlock programs.
    • Significant challenges exist in mandatory program implementation.
    • Rejection of interlock programs by offenders is common.

    Conclusions:

    • Increased offender participation requires stronger sanctions for non-compliance.
    • Combining ignition interlocks with electronic house arrest may maximize program use.
    • Policy adjustments are needed to enhance the effectiveness of impaired driving interventions.