Related Experiment Videos
The Afghan experiment: the Afghan Support Group, Principled Common Programming and the Strategic Framework
1Inst for the Study of Intl Migration, Georgetown University, USA. Ajk23@georgetown.edu
Disasters
|October 4, 2003
Summary
The Afghan Support Group (ASG), Principled Common Programming (PCP), and Strategic Framework (SF) offered a promising model for improving humanitarian aid coherence and efficiency in complex emergencies.
Area of Science:
- Humanitarian Aid and International Relations
- Development Studies
- Conflict Resolution
Background:
- Humanitarian assistance in Taliban-run Afghanistan (1997-2001) faced significant challenges.
- Unique coordination mechanisms were established by the international community.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the success of the Afghan Support Group (ASG), Principled Common Programming (PCP), and Strategic Framework (SF) experiment.
- To identify limitations and suggest improvements for these mechanisms.
- To analyze the politicization of humanitarian aid.
Main Methods:
- Analysis from the perspective of a leading donor.
- Evaluation of policy coherence, program efficiency, and aid-peace synergy.
- Assessment of factors limiting achievements.
Main Results:
- The ASG/PCP/SF experiment demonstrated promising achievements in increasing coherence and efficiency.
- Factors limiting success were identified, and potential improvements were suggested.
- The study analyzed the extent to which humanitarian assistance became politicized.
Conclusions:
- The Afghan aid experiment (ASG/PCP/SF) provides a valuable precedent for managing complex humanitarian emergencies.
- The mechanisms showed sufficient promise to warrant consideration for application in other contexts.
- Further research could explore the long-term impact and adaptability of these approaches.