Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical categorization for elective surgery in Victoria.

Colin Russell1, Maree Roberts, Timothy G Williamson

  • 1Peninsula Health and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. crussell@phen.vic.gov.au

ANZ Journal of Surgery
|October 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Clinician categorization for elective surgery shows a trend towards semi-urgent (category 2) over non-urgent (category 3), leading to longer wait times. This "category creep" suggests prioritization needs objective tools.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A lipidomic based metabolic age score for monitoring the effects of lifestyle and diet on metabolic disease risk.

Research square·2026
Same author

Discovery of gene-alcohol interaction loci influencing blood pressure in 1.1 million individuals from multiple populations.

Research square·2026
Same author

Single-Center Experience with Sonic Estimation of Elasticity via Resonance (SEER)-Guided Hemostasis in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2025
Same author

Aspirin and healthy lifespan in older people: main outcome of the ASPREE-XT observational study.

The lancet. Healthy longevity·2025
Same author

Clinical deployment and prospective validation of an AI model for limb-length discrepancy measurements using an open-source platform.

European radiology·2025
Same author

Interprofessional Approach to Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care nurse·2025

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Elective surgery waiting lists are crucial for managing patient flow and resource allocation.
  • Accurate urgency categorization is essential for timely and equitable patient treatment.
  • Previous studies highlight variations in surgical prioritization criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in how clinicians assign urgency categories for elective surgeries.
  • To investigate changes in the utilization of urgency categories for hip replacement and prostatectomy over time.
  • To identify potential 'category creep' and its impact on waiting lists.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of the Victorian Elective Surgery Information System database.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of patient additions to waiting lists for hip replacement and prostatectomy.
  • Comparison of urgency category utilization across two distinct 12-month periods.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant inconsistency observed in the categorization of patients for hip and prostate surgery.
    • A notable increase in assigning patients to the semi-urgent (category 2) over non-urgent (category 3) classification.
    • Evidence of 'category creep,' where less urgent cases may compete with genuinely semi-urgent cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Growing imbalance between demand and availability for lower-urgency elective procedures.
    • Lengthening wait times mean many patients exceed clinically recommended treatment durations.
    • Current categorization lacks objectivity and consensus; clinical prioritization tools are under evaluation.