Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nebulized bronchodilator formulations: unit-dose or multi-dose?

Joseph L Rau1, Ruben D Restrepo

  • 1Cardiopulmonary Care Sciences, MSC 8R0319, Georgia State University, 33 Gilmer Street SE, Unit 8, Atlanta GA 30303-3088. resjlr@langate.gsu.edu

Respiratory Care
|October 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Hyperinflation Before and After Open Endotracheal Suctioning Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Respiratory care·2020
Same author

Evaluation of Capnography Sampling Line Compatibility and Accuracy when Used with a Portable Capnography Monitor.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2020
Same author

Adherence to an Oxygen-Weaning Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated Adults in the Medical ICU.

Respiratory care·2020
Same author

Endotracheal cuff pressures in the PICU: Incidence of underinflation and overinflation.

Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR·2020
Same author

Ability of ICU Health-Care Professionals to Identify Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony Using Waveform Analysis.

Respiratory care·2017
Same author

Assessing Respiratory System Mechanical Function.

Clinics in chest medicine·2016
Same journal

Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparative Evaluation of Risk Scores for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications".

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Stable COPD: A Multimodal Assessment of Diaphragmatic and Cough-Related Impairment.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Flow Asynchronies During Pressure Support Ventilation in Children: A Bench Model Study.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Inspiratory Effort Assessment Using the Occlusion Pressure-Derived Tension-Time Index.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Clinical Usage of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Across Disease Categories and Care Settings: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Devices as Analyzed in Lung Models: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Data.

Respiratory care·2026
See all related articles

Multi-dose bronchodilator formulations pose a risk of nosocomial infections. A sterile, low-volume unit-dose vial could offer a safer alternative for nebulizer therapy, improving patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Infection Control in Healthcare Settings
  • Respiratory Therapy Practices
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations

Background:

  • Nosocomial infections have been linked to the use of multi-dose bronchodilator nebulizer formulations.
  • Concerns exist regarding the safety and efficacy of current multi-dose versus unit-dose formulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey American hospital respiratory therapy services regarding practices, opinions, and awareness of unit-dose and multi-dose bronchodilator formulations.
  • To assess the perceived benefits and drawbacks of each formulation type.

Main Methods:

  • A web-based survey was administered to 409 directors of respiratory therapy services across various hospital sizes in the United States.
  • The survey collected data on hospital practices, policies, and knowledge concerning multi-dose and unit-dose bronchodilator use.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Multi-dose bottles were used for approximately 20% of nebulizer treatments, with 77% of hospitals using them for multiple patients.
  • Only 3% of facilities followed manufacturer recommendations for multi-dose bottle usage duration; 81% prepared treatments at the bedside.
  • While multi-dose was favored for cost (84%), unit-dose was preferred for reduced contamination risk (92%); 73% found unit-dose more cost-effective overall.

Conclusions:

  • Multi-dose bronchodilator bottles are a potential source of nosocomial infections when infection control procedures are not strictly followed.
  • A sterile, low-volume unit-dose vial formulation is perceived as a useful alternative for bronchodilator therapy, potentially replacing multi-dose bottles.