Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method.

Daniel A Low1, James F Dempsey

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. low@radonc.wustl.edu

Medical Physics
|October 8, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Education as a Tool to Navigate Changing Technology in Radiation Oncology.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Dosimetric Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Versus Reduced Margin Computed Tomography Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025
Same author

A Retrospective Analysis of the First Clinical 5DCT Workflow.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Will large language model AI (ChatGPT) be a benefit or a risk to quality for submission of medical physics manuscripts?

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Introducing a novel sub-millimeter lung CT image registration error quantitation tool.

Medical physics·2024
Same author

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Guidance for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from the MIRAGE Randomized Clinical Trial.

European urology·2024

The gamma tool quantitatively compares radiation dose distributions. Noise in dose data can lead to inaccurate gamma index evaluations, impacting its clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Dosimetry

Background:

  • The gamma index is a widely used metric for quantitatively comparing radiation dose distributions.
  • It allows for simultaneous evaluation along dose and distance axes after renormalization.
  • The gamma index has applications in evaluating dose calculation algorithms and comparing dosimetry measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the behavior of the gamma distribution in two dimensions.
  • To evaluate the impact of data noise on the gamma distribution.
  • To assess the clinical applicability and computational efficiency of the gamma tool.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions using the gamma tool.
  • Renormalization of dose and distance scales for evaluated and reference distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of gamma distribution behavior under varying noise conditions in both distributions.
  • Evaluation of computational time for clinical cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Noise in the evaluated dose distribution leads to an underestimation of the gamma distribution.
    • Noise in the reference dose distribution proportionally increases noise in the gamma distribution.
    • Typical clinical evaluations use criteria such as 5% and 2-3 mm.
    • Calculation time for clinical cases is approximately 5 minutes with specified resolution and hardware.

    Conclusions:

    • The gamma tool provides a robust method for dose distribution comparison.
    • Data noise significantly affects gamma index accuracy, necessitating careful consideration in clinical practice.
    • The gamma tool demonstrates practical feasibility for clinical use with acceptable computation times.