Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Effect of duplicate isolates of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on
Rebecca T Horvat1, Neil E Klutman, Melinda K Lacy
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. rhorvat@kumc.edu
Abstract:
Duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates were analyzed to determine the impact of multiple isolates from the same patient on annual antibiogram data. During a 6-year period (1996 to 2001), 3,227 patients with 4,844 S. aureus isolates were evaluated. A total of 39% of patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 860) and 23% of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (n = 2,367) infections had duplicate isolates. Cumulative data show that 91% of the patients during this 6-year period with duplicate isolates (2 to 13 duplicates/year) did not switch between MSSA and MRSA but retained the original S. aureus strain whether it was MSSA or MRSA. Rates of MRSA were calculated for each year by using all isolates and then eliminating duplicates. The impact of duplicate MRSA and MSSA isolates was evaluated by using the ratio of isolates per patient such that ratios of >1.0 indicate >1 isolate per patient. The 6-year ratio for MRSA was 1.90 isolates/patient, and the ratio for MSSA was 1.35. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted in the MRSA rates in 4 of 6 years when duplicate isolates were removed. Common phenotypic antibiogram patterns were compared for all MRSA isolates during the 6-year period, and 64% were of a single antibiogram phenotype. Eighty-eight percent of patients with duplicate MRSA isolates had phenotypically identical multiple isolates. The rate of MRSA differs when duplicate isolates are removed from the antibiogram data.
Insights
Duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates significantly impact annual antimicrobial resistance data. Removing duplicate isolates from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) analyses reveals different infection rates.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Accurate antimicrobial resistance surveillance is crucial for effective treatment strategies.
- Duplicate isolates from the same patient can skew annual antibiogram data, potentially misrepresenting true resistance rates.
- Understanding the prevalence and impact of duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates is essential for refining epidemiological studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the impact of multiple Staphylococcus aureus isolates from individual patients on annual antibiogram data.
- To evaluate how duplicate isolates affect the calculated rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 4,844 Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 3,227 patients over a 6-year period (1996-2001).
- Comparison of annual MRSA and MSSA rates calculated with and without duplicate isolates.
- Evaluation of isolate ratios per patient (>1.0 indicates duplicates) and comparison of phenotypic antibiogram patterns for duplicate MRSA isolates.
Main Results:
- 39% of MRSA and 23% of MSSA patients had duplicate isolates.
- 91% of patients with duplicate isolates retained the same strain type (MRSA or MSSA).
- MRSA rates differed significantly (P < 0.05) in 4 out of 6 years when duplicate isolates were removed. The 6-year MRSA ratio was 1.90 isolates/patient, and MSSA was 1.35.
- 88% of patients with duplicate MRSA isolates had phenotypically identical isolates.
Conclusions:
- Duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates can alter perceived annual antimicrobial resistance rates.
- Excluding duplicate isolates provides a more accurate representation of MRSA and MSSA prevalence.
- Antimicrobial resistance surveillance methodologies should account for duplicate isolates to ensure data integrity.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic Selection