Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning in bioethics.

Grant Gillett1

  • 1Otago Bioethics Centre, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin PO Box 913, New Zealand. grant.gillett@stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Bioethics
|October 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Both Sides, Now: A Personal Stroke Recovery Journey.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2025
Same author

The ethics of war-time data in paediatric trauma: attitudes, angles and impacts.

BMJ global health·2023
Same author

"When the Music's Over" then "Dancing with a Partner Will Help You Find the Beat".

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2021
Same author

Strengthening global commitment to eliminating cervical cancer: What lessons from the past can we apply to the future?

Journal of global health·2020
Same author

COVID-19 Ethics-Looking Down the Muzzle.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2020
Same author

First report the findings: genuine balance when reporting CTE.

The Lancet. Neurology·2019
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Bioethical arguments can appear irrational, mirroring mental disorder discourse. This study explores these irrationalities and suggests corrections for practical bioethics.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Bioethical arguments sometimes appear implausible or counterintuitive to moral agents.
  • These arguments share similarities with the discourse observed in patients with severe mental disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the nature of irrationality within bioethical arguments.
  • To discuss the implications of such irrationality for bioethics as a guide for practical reasoning.
  • To propose correctives for addressing flawed ethical analyses in bioethics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of bioethical arguments.
  • Comparative examination of reasoning patterns in bioethics and clinical psychology/psychiatry.
  • Philosophical inquiry into the nature of practical reasoning and ethical justification.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional Ethics

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified specific types of irrationality in bioethical discourse.
  • Highlighted the worrying disconnect between some bioethical arguments and practical moral reasoning.
  • Suggested that overly neat, rational arguments leading to counterintuitive conclusions warrant suspicion.

Conclusions:

  • Bioethics must address its internal irrationalities to remain a relevant guide for real-life decisions.
  • New approaches are needed to reframe bioethical problems, ensuring they align with fundamental human values.
  • A critical stance towards arguments yielding counterintuitive results is essential for advancing ethical analysis.