Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses.

M S John1, A Dimitrijevic, T W Picton

  • 1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, University of Toronto, Canada. sasha@psych.utoronto.ca

Ear and Hearing
|October 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data for an Advanced Microstructural and Electrochemical Datasheet on 18650 Li-ion Batteries with Nickel-Rich NMC811 Cathodes and Graphite-Silicon Anodes.

Data in brief·2020
Same author

First Report of Charcoal Rot on Zebra Plant (Aphelandra squarrosa) Caused by Macrophomina phaseolina.

Plant disease·2018
Same author

A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Co-overexpression of bcl-2 and c-myc in uterine cervix carcinomas and premalignant lesions.

European journal of histochemistry : EJH·2011
Same author

Attention modulates beta oscillations during prolonged tactile stimulation.

The European journal of neuroscience·2010
Same author

Micronucleus frequency in women with genital Chlamydia Trachomatis infection before and after therapy.

Mutation research·2006
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Auditory steady-state responses to noise and transient stimuli are faster and larger than those to pure tones. These findings suggest potential for rapid, objective hearing screening using these stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Auditory Evoked Potentials

Background:

  • Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are objective measures of hearing sensitivity.
  • Evaluating ASSRs typically involves stimuli like pure tones, but their efficiency can vary.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the magnitude and detection time of ASSRs evoked by various auditory stimuli.
  • To determine the optimal stimuli for rapid and reliable hearing assessment.

Main Methods:

  • ASSRs were recorded in sleeping adults using amplitude-modulated pure tones, broadband noise, band-limited noise, and transient stimuli (clicks, brief tones/noise).
  • Stimuli were presented dichotically at 30-50 dB above behavioral thresholds.
  • Response significance was assessed based on time to detection and response magnitude.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Noise stimuli elicited larger ASSRs than pure tones, with faster detection times (average 43 sec for modulated noise vs. ~2 min for tones).
  • Transient stimuli yielded even faster detection (average ~20 sec) and larger responses at higher intensities compared to broadband noise.
  • Exponential envelopes did not enhance noise response amplitudes.

Conclusions:

  • Amplitude-modulated noise and transient stimuli show promise for rapid, objective hearing screening.
  • Combining responses to multiple frequency-specific stimuli may offer a quick indication of hearing presence.