Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Failed posterior urethroplasty: lessons learned.

Mamdouh M Koraitim¹

¹Department of Urology, University of Alexandria College of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.

|October 11, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Urethral and penile war injuries: The experience from civil violence in Iraq.

Arab journal of urology·2015

Same author

Editorial.

Arab journal of urology·2015

Same author

The combined perineo-abdominal transpubic urethroplasty.

Arab journal of urology·2015

Same author

Optimising the outcome after anastomotic posterior urethroplasty.

Arab journal of urology·2015

Same author

Bladder neck incompetence at posterior urethroplasty.

Arab journal of urology·2015

Same author

Predicting risk of erectile dysfunction after pelvic fracture urethral injury in children.

The Journal of urology·2014

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Posterior urethroplasty success hinges on complete scar excision, secure prostatic mucosa fixation, and tension-free anastomosis. Adhering to these surgical details minimizes unsuccessful outcomes in treating urethral strictures.

Area of Science:

Urology
Surgical Techniques
Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

Posterior urethral strictures, often post-traumatic, present complex reconstructive challenges.
Anastomotic urethroplasty is a primary surgical approach for these defects.
Identifying factors influencing surgical success is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify key factors contributing to unsuccessful posterior urethroplasty outcomes.
To establish guidelines for preventing complications and improving success rates.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 145 anastomotic urethroplasty procedures in 130 patients (ages 3-58) for post-traumatic posterior urethral distraction defects.
Procedures included perineal and perineo-abdominal transpubic approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Standardization of sutures, urethral stents, and antibiotics; analysis of unsuccessful cases over 2-20 years follow-up.

Main Results:

Overall unsuccessful rate was 8% (12 of 145 procedures).
Causes of failure included incomplete scar excision (3), inadequate prostatic mucosa fixation (6), and anastomotic tension (2).
Previous repair, defect length, and urinary infection did not significantly impact results.

Conclusions:

Complete scar excision in the membrano-prostatic region is essential.
Secure lateral fixation of prostatic mucosa and tension-free anastomosis are critical for success.
Alternative surgical approaches (perineo-abdominal or elaborated perineal) should be considered if tension-free anastomosis is not achievable via perineal route.