Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Enhancing toxicity test performance by using a statistical criterion.

Debra L Denton1, John F Fox, Florence A Fulk

  • 1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Sacramento, California 95814, USA. denton.debra@epa.gov

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|October 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sensitivity analysis of pesticide concentrations in California Central Valley vernal pools.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2019
Same author

Comparison of false-positive rates of 2 hypothesis-test approaches in relation to laboratory toxicity test performance.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2019
Same author

Forest fires and the snowshoe hare-Canada lynx cycle.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Lack of induced chemical defense in juvenile Alaskan woody plants in response to simulated browsing.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Instability of the snowshoe hare and woody plant interaction.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Pollen limitation of reproductive effort in willows.

Oecologia·2017
Same journal

From laboratory to the field: the role of microplastics as vectors of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure assessment of Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) and barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) eggs and nestlings collected along Snow Creek and Choccolocco Creek watersheds near Anniston, Alabama, USA.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Domestic dog exposure to glyphosate in Australia.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Toxicity of green energy by-products beryllium and tungsten to temperate freshwater species from a Global Biodiversity Hotspot.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Biomagnification of Mercury in Wolves and Their Prey in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Can forensic aggregate exposure pathways support exposure evaluation in toxic torts?

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Quality assurance in aquatic toxicity testing is crucial. Evaluating the percent minimum significant difference (PMSD) helps ensure reliable results and enhances the detection of toxic effects in aquatic organisms.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Laboratory Science

Background:

  • Aquatic toxicity tests assess biological impacts of environmental substances on aquatic life.
  • Ensuring test repeatability and quality assurance is vital for reliable ecotoxicological data.
  • Reference toxicant tests are key for monitoring laboratory performance over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate reference toxicant test data for quality assurance in aquatic toxicity testing.
  • To assess the utility of the percent minimum significant difference (PMSD) for data quality.
  • To propose standardized PMSD bounds for improving test reliability.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of reference toxicant test data generated within and across laboratories.
  • Evaluation of the minimum significant difference (MSD) as an indicator of within-test variability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical assessment of PMSD values in relation to test method performance.

    • Main Results:

    • The percent minimum significant difference (PMSD) is a valuable metric for assessing aquatic toxicity test quality.
    • Smaller MSD values correlate with increased statistical power to detect toxic effects.
    • Establishing PMSD bounds can minimize variability and enhance statistical power.

    Conclusions:

    • Reporting and evaluating PMSD is recommended for all aquatic toxicity test results.
    • Implementing upper and lower PMSD bounds can improve the consistency and sensitivity of toxicity testing.
    • Laboratories may need to optimize replication, reduce replicate variability, or improve control performance to meet PMSD criteria.