Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frontiers in maxillofacial endoscopic surgery.

Ralf Schön1, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Rainer Schmelzeisen

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. schoen@zmk2.ukl.uni-freiburg.de

Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America
|October 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Keratocystoma of the Parotid Gland: A Systematic Review of Clinicopathologic Characteristics.

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology·2026
Same author

Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis Patterns and Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Staging in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Heterotopic ossification of the masseter muscle following injection lipolysis: A case report and review.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Comparison between patient-specific implants and hand-bent plates in mandibular reconstruction.

Clinical oral investigations·2026
Same author

A Prospective, International, Multicentre Registry of Patients Undergoing Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction After Mandibular Resection for Tumours and Drug-Induced Osteonecrosis: A Study Protocol.

Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction·2026
Same author

Timing and extent of Peri-Implant bone loss for dental implant removal: A retrospective Cross-Sectional analysis.

Clinical oral investigations·2026

Endoscopically assisted techniques offer minimally invasive options for condylar process fractures, reducing risks like nerve damage and scars. However, severe facial fractures still require traditional open approaches for effective treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Condylar process fractures can be treated with endoscopically assisted techniques.
  • These methods allow for limited incisions and improved intraoperative control in challenging areas.
  • Minimally invasive endoscopic approaches can reduce the risk of facial nerve damage and visible scarring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and limitations of endoscopically assisted techniques in treating condylar process fractures.
  • To compare endoscopic methods with traditional open approaches for maxillofacial trauma.

Main Methods:

  • Review of endoscopically assisted techniques for open reduction of condylar process fractures.
  • Analysis of intraoperative control, risk of facial nerve damage, and scar visibility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison with indications for traditional open treatment of maxillofacial trauma.

    • Main Results:

    • Endoscopic techniques provide limited incisions for open reduction of condylar process fractures.
    • Improved intraoperative control is achievable in areas with limited exposure.
    • Reduced risk of facial nerve damage and extensive scarring compared to traditional methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Endoscopically assisted techniques offer advantages for specific maxillofacial fractures.
    • Indications for open treatment of severe or comminuted facial fractures remain unchanged.
    • Traditional intraoral and extraoral approaches are still necessary for extensive reconstructions.