Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical errors as a result of specialization.

Ahmad Hashem1, Michelene T H Chi, Charles P Friedman

  • 1Healthcare Industry Solutions Group, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052, USA. ahmad@hashem.net

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
|October 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient Perceptions and preferences for the disclosure of artificial intelligence generated draft replies to electronic messages - A qualitative study.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same author

The Potential for a Benefit-Estimating Algorithm to Improve Recommendations for Preventive Services: Comparing Algorithm Recommendations with Those of Primary Care Providers.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Informatics Infrastructure for the Learning Health System.

Annual review of biomedical data science·2026
Same author

Ten Reasons Why Learning Health Systems Will Have a Transformational Effect on Health and Health Care.

Learning health systems·2025
Same author

The PaTH from discovery to implementation: Using a PCORnet® Clinical Research Network's own research to prioritize topics for collaborative health improvement activities.

Learning health systems·2025
Same author

Four distinct models of learning health systems: Strength through diversity.

Learning health systems·2025
Same journal

Causal intervention validation of gene regulatory signals in scGPT.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

CoAff-DTI: Fine-grained drug-target interaction prediction using pre-trained language models and affinity-guided mechanisms.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of temporal preservation in synthetic longitudinal patient data.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

ARKE: An ontology-driven framework for automated mapping of local radiology procedure terms to the LOINC-RadLex playbook using large language model.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

A validation-driven training controller for cross-lingual biomedical NER via reinforcement learning-based adaptive loss weighting.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

ASP-HR: An Adaptive Spatial Perception and Hierarchical Reasoning mechanism for document-level biomedical relation extraction.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
See all related articles

Physician diagnostic bias can lead to medical errors. Specialists tend to misdiagnose cases outside their expertise as being within their specialty, potentially impacting patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Medical error analysis
  • Diagnostic bias in medicine
  • Cognitive biases in healthcare professionals

Background:

  • Medical errors contribute to significant preventable mortality, with over 44,000 deaths annually.
  • Diagnostic errors by specialized physicians represent a critical area of concern within patient safety.
  • Existing error frameworks suggest cognitive biases may influence clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that medical specialists exhibit a domain-specific diagnostic bias.
  • To determine if physicians are inclined to diagnose external cases as belonging to their own specialty.
  • To quantify the extent of this bias in internal medicine subspecialties.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-two board-certified physicians from four internal medicine subspecialties participated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Physicians evaluated four patient cases each, with some cases falling outside their subspecialty.
  • Verbal protocol analysis and general linear modeling were employed to analyze diagnostic reasoning and data.

    • Main Results:

    • The experimental hypothesis was supported, indicating a tendency for specialists to 'pull' cases toward their domain.
    • Specialists generated a higher number of diagnostic hypotheses within their area of expertise compared to outside.
    • Physicians assigned greater diagnostic probabilities to conditions within their specialty, even for external cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Specialized physicians demonstrate a cognitive bias favoring diagnoses within their own subspecialty.
    • This diagnostic bias may contribute to medical errors and impact the accuracy of patient diagnoses.
    • Understanding and mitigating this bias is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.