Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the efficacy of intervention.

David S Guzick1, John T Queenan

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 706, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. david_guzick@urmc.rochester.edu

Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
|October 17, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Physicians must weigh medical evidence using the preponderance of evidence standard, prioritizing larger, randomized, and rigorously designed studies. Clinical decisions require balancing available data with patient needs, acknowledging that evidence continually evolves.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacy Benefit Managers in the Eye of the Storm: Growing Multipartite Scrutiny.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2024
Same author

The 'Invisible Hand' Doesn't Work for Prescription Drugs.

The American journal of medicine·2022
Same author

Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016-2018.

Fertility and sterility·2021
Same author

It's time to phase out "serologic weak D phenotype" and resolve D types with RHD genotyping including weak D type 4.

Transfusion·2020
Same author

Can the US Health Care Industry Be Improved Without Blowing It Up?

Family medicine·2020
Same author

Reprint of: Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.

Fertility and sterility·2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Evidence Evaluation
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Scientific Literature Assessment

Background:

  • The preponderance of evidence standard, used in civil trials, is applicable to evaluating medical literature.
  • Physicians must make treatment decisions based on the best available evidence, even if it is incomplete.
  • Scientific research continually generates new data, necessitating ongoing reevaluation of medical practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the application of the preponderance of evidence standard to medical literature.
  • To highlight the challenges physicians face in making timely clinical decisions amidst evolving scientific data.
  • To differentiate the roles of researchers and clinicians in evidence interpretation and application.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating the hierarchy of evidence in medical literature (e.g., study size, design, risk of bias).
  • Analyzing the impact of statistical significance versus bias in research findings.
  • Drawing parallels between judicial decision-making and clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Larger, randomized, and rigorously designed studies should carry more weight in evidence evaluation.
    • Statistical significance excludes chance but not bias as explanations for observed associations.
    • Physicians must act decisively with current evidence, similar to judges, despite potential future revisions.

    Conclusions:

    • The preponderance of evidence is a suitable framework for assessing medical literature reliability.
    • Physicians' decisions are based on the best available data at the time, acknowledging the dynamic nature of medical knowledge.
    • The practice of medicine involves continuous learning and reevaluation of evidence throughout a physician's career.