Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing fluid mechanics models with experimental data.

G R Spedding1

  • 1Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1191, USA. geoff@usc.edu

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|October 17, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to 'On the possibility (or lack thereof) of agreement between experiment and computation of flows over wings at moderate Reynolds number'.

Interface focus·2017
Same author

On the possibility (or lack thereof) of agreement between experiment and computation of flows over wings at moderate Reynolds number.

Interface focus·2017
Same author

Leading-edge vortex improves lift in slow-flying bats.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2008
Same author

Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel.

The Journal of experimental biology·2008
Same author

The implications of low-speed fixed-wing aerofoil measurements on the analysis and performance of flapping bird wings.

The Journal of experimental biology·2008
Same author

Bat flight generates complex aerodynamic tracks.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2007
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Simplified fluid mechanics models, like vortex models, aid understanding of animal locomotion and aerodynamics. Comparing these models with experimental data, including variations, is crucial for validating predictions.

Area of Science:

  • Fluid mechanics
  • Aerodynamics
  • Biomechanical modeling

Background:

  • Navier-Stokes equations offer comprehensive fluid mechanics models but are complex.
  • Simplified models are needed for practical applications, especially in animal locomotion.
  • Vortex models excel in predicting flows with localized shearing, common in aerodynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore simplified mathematical and experimental modeling in fluid mechanics.
  • To demonstrate the utility of vortex models for understanding complex flows.
  • To outline principles for comparing model predictions with experimental results.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing mathematical vortex models for flow abstraction.
  • Employing experimental models with real fluids to study fluid mechanics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing model predictions with experimental data, accounting for variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Vortex models successfully predict and enhance understanding of aerodynamic and animal locomotion flows.
    • Experimental models provide practical fluid mechanics insights.
    • Accurate comparison requires numerical estimates of experimental variations.

    Conclusions:

    • Simplified fluid mechanics models are essential for practical problem-solving.
    • Vortex models offer valuable insights into complex fluid dynamics.
    • Rigorous comparison of models and experiments, including uncertainty analysis, is key for scientific validation.