Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Regional heterogeneities of oligodendrocytes underlie biased Ranvier node spacing along single axons in sound localization circuit.

eLife·2025

Same author

Twinfilin-1 phosphorylation in reelin signaling regulates actin dynamics and spine development.

Pharmacological research·2025

Same author

Activity-dependent refinement of axonal projections forms one-to-one connection pattern in the developing chick ciliary ganglion.

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience·2025

Same author

Loss of neuronal activity facilitates surface accumulation of p75NTR and cell death in avian cochlear nucleus.

Neuroscience research·2025

Same author

Infertility treatment is associated with increased risk of postpartum hospitalization due to heart disease.

Journal of internal medicine·2024

Same author

Risk of Stroke Hospitalization After Infertility Treatment.

JAMA network open·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Preparation and Culture of Chicken Auditory Brainstem Slices

Preparation and Culture of Chicken Auditory Brainstem Slices

Published on: March 21, 2011

Evaluation of the limiting acuity of coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris of the chicken.

Hiroshi Kuba¹, Rei Yamada, Harunori Ohmori

¹Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

The Journal of Physiology

|October 17, 2003

Summary

Temperature significantly enhances sound localization acuity in birds by improving neural coincidence detection. Higher temperatures narrow the time window for detecting inter-aural time differences (ITDs) in the nucleus laminaris (NL).

More Related Videos

Slicing the Embryonic Chicken Auditory Brainstem to Evaluate Tonotopic Gradients and Microcircuits

Slicing the Embryonic Chicken Auditory Brainstem to Evaluate Tonotopic Gradients and Microcircuits

Published on: July 12, 2022

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Preparation and Culture of Chicken Auditory Brainstem Slices

Preparation and Culture of Chicken Auditory Brainstem Slices

Published on: March 21, 2011

Slicing the Embryonic Chicken Auditory Brainstem to Evaluate Tonotopic Gradients and Microcircuits

Slicing the Embryonic Chicken Auditory Brainstem to Evaluate Tonotopic Gradients and Microcircuits

Published on: July 12, 2022

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Auditory Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience

Background:

Sound localization relies on detecting minute inter-aural time differences (ITDs).
In birds, the nucleus laminaris (NL) neurons encode ITDs via precise coincidence detection of binaural synaptic inputs.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of temperature on the precision of coincidence detection in chick NL.
To elucidate the underlying synaptic mechanisms responsible for temperature-dependent acuity.

Main Methods:

Whole-cell and cell-attached recordings were performed in chick brain slices.
Bilateral electrical stimulation of nucleus magnocellularis projections to NL was used.
Coincidence detection precision was quantified by measuring the spiking probability time window.

Main Results:

Coincidence detection acuity improved with increasing temperature, reaching a time window of 0.38 ms at 40°C.
EPSP durations became faster or equivalent to EPSC durations at higher temperatures.
Activation of low-threshold K+ currents accelerated EPSPs, correlating positively with coincidence detection sharpness.

Conclusions:

Elevated temperatures enhance neural precision for ITD detection in the avian auditory system.
The acceleration of EPSPs via low-threshold K+ currents is a key mechanism for improved acuity.
The observed neural precision is sufficient to explain in vivo ITD detection capabilities.