Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Tissue-Engineered Graft for Circumferential Esophageal Reconstruction in Rats
Published on: February 10, 2020
[Early esophageal replacement in patients with esophageal atresia]
F Hernández1, S Rivas, L F Avila
1Hospital Infantil La Paz, Departamento de Cirugía Pediátrica, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid. Pacohern73@hotmail.com
Insights
Esophageal replacement is a viable option for long-gap esophageal atresia, offering 100% survival and good functional outcomes. This surgical approach can be safely performed in infants, but careful management of associated conditions is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Thoracic Surgery
Context:
- Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital condition requiring surgical intervention.
- Primary anastomosis is not always feasible in cases of long-gap EA.
- Esophageal replacement offers an alternative when primary repair fails.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the outcomes of esophageal replacement in infants with long-gap EA.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of gastric pull-up and colonic transposition techniques.
- To report on short-term and long-term complications associated with esophageal replacement.
Summary:
- Fifty children with EA were treated, with nine undergoing esophageal replacement due to long gaps.
- Procedures included gastric pull-up (2) and colonic transposition (7).
- All patients survived with functional grafts, experiencing manageable postoperative complications and good long-term oral feeding.
Impact:
- Esophageal replacement demonstrates a 100% survival rate and positive functional results in long-gap EA.
- The procedure is safe in early infancy, provided associated malformations are managed.
- While effective, esophageal replacement carries risks of complications similar to other treatment options.
Introduction:
When primary anastomosis is not feasible in esophageal atresia esophageal replacement is one of the possible options. We report our experience with this approach in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.
Materials And Methods:
From 1991 to 2002 we treated 50 children with esophageal atresia. Nine required esophageal replacement because of long-gaps. Six were boys and three girls. Six had isolated atresia, and three had regular atresia with TEF. Associated malformations in 8 patients were: cardiovascular (2), anorectal (2), urogenital (5), intestinal duplication (1), and costovertebral (1). The weight at birth ranged from 1.2 to 3.95 kg (median 2.3). Patients with type I atresia had immediate gastrostomy accompanied by esophagostomy in one. Esophageal anastomosis was impossible or failed in 3 patients with type III EA, who had fistula ligation and esophagostomy. Esophageal replacement was performed at a median age of 4.95 months (range 2.3 to 18), with a median weight of 5.33 (range 2.89 to 11.5 kg.). We used gastric pull-up in 2 cases and colonic transposition in 7 with isoperistaltic left transverse colon in retromediastinal-transhiatal (6) or restrosternal (1) position. Two patients had extramucosal piloromyotomy and 4 had piloroplasty.
Results:
All patients survive and have functional grafts. Postoperative complications were: pneumonia (1), wound dehiscence with evisceration (2) and salivary fístula (2) which closed spontaneously. In the long range, one patient was operated three times for hernia through the enlarged hiatus, one had one episode of intestinal subobstruction successfully managed with nasogastric aspiration and another one had dumping syndrome for several months. After a median follow-up of 3.15 years (range 1.6 to 6.9) all patients eat normal diets per os.
Conclusions:
Esophageal replacement for the treatment of infants with long-gap EA has been in our hands as good as any other option with 100% survival and good functional results. The operation can be safely performed in the first months provided that associated malformations are under control. However, like other options, this approach is not devoid of complications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Achalasia

