Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
The place of closed mitral valvotomy in the modern cardiac surgery era
Ufuk Tütün1, A Tulga Ulus, Aysen I Aksöyek
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Closed mitral valvotomy (CMV) shows long-term efficacy with low in-hospital mortality and high freedom from thromboembolism. Reoperation rates vary, influenced by factors like mitral restenosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
Background:
- Closed mitral valvotomy (CMV) is a procedure for mitral stenosis.
- Long-term outcomes of CMV require thorough investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term efficacy and outcomes of closed mitral valvotomy (CMV).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,134 patients undergoing CMV over 36 years.
- Data collected from hospital records and outpatient clinic follow-ups.
Main Results:
- Low in-hospital mortality (0.4%) and thromboembolism rates (99.0% freedom at 36 years).
- Reoperation rate was 44.1%, with mitral restenosis being the primary indication.
- Factors like reduced mitral valve area and postoperative insufficiency predicted reoperation.
Conclusions:
- CMV is a simple, effective, and cost-efficient technique compared to alternatives.
- Satisfactory long-term results are achievable with CMV for selected patients.
Background And Aim Of The Study:
The study aim was to investigate the long-term efficacy of closed mitral valvotomy (CMV).
Methods:
Data obtained over a 36-year period from 1,134 patients who underwent CMV were analyzed. The analysis was carried out retrospectively from hospital records, with follow up examinations being conducted mainly at the outpatient clinic.
Results:
In-hospital mortality (< or = 30 days after surgery) was 0.4% (n = 5, all closed procedures). Cardiac failure was the main cause of early death, and postoperative peripheral embolism occurred in five cases (0.5%). Freedom from thromboembolism was 99.0 +/- 0.5% at 36 years. Operative results were satisfactory in most patients, and severe mitral incompetence was seen only in three cases. Post-valvotomy mitral regurgitation occurred in 88 patients (7.7%) during the first year after CMV. Reoperation was performed in 500 patients (44.1%). The mean interval between CMV and reoperation was 141.1 +/- 80.8 months (range: 1-436 months). Fourteen patients were reoperated on for mitral regurgitation, 485 for mitral restenosis, and five for mixed mitral valve disease (stenosis and regurgitation). Freedom from reoperation after CMV was 81.4 +/- 1.3% at 10 years, 16.4 +/- 2.1% at 20 years, 3.1 +/- 1.2% at 20 years, and 0% at 36 years. Cox regression analysis indicated that impaired functional capacity, reduced mitral valve area, gradual increase in left atrial diameter and postoperative mitral insufficiency increased the reoperation rate after CMV.
Conclusion:
When compared with percutaneous balloon or surgical open valvotomy, CMV represents a satisfactory technique in terms of simplicity, high efficacy and lower cost.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
08:42Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests