Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MEDLINE SDI services: how do they compare?

Mary Shultz1, Sandra L De Groote

  • 1Library of the Health Sciences, Urbana University of Illinois at Chicago, 102 Medical Sciences Building, 506 South Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. shultz@uic.edu

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
|October 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Collection practices for nontraditional online resources among academic health sciences libraries.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2020
Same author

Serving Community Faculty Through a Dedicated Liaison.

Medical reference services quarterly·2018
Same author

Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2016
Same author

Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.

PloS one·2015
Same author

Information-seeking behavior and the use of online resources: a snapshot of current health sciences faculty.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2014
Same author

Measures of health sciences journal use: a comparison of vendor, link-resolver, and local citation statistics.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2013

Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI) services for MEDLINE searches vary in results and features. Evaluating these systems is crucial for efficient information retrieval and staying current in research.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Information Science
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI) services provide regular updates on user-selected topics, enhancing currency and productivity.
  • Numerous platforms exist for establishing, storing, and automating MEDLINE searches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe, evaluate, and compare various Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI) services for accessing MEDLINE databases.

Main Methods:

  • Six SDI services (PubMed Cubby, BioMail, JADE, PubCrawler, OVID, ScienceDirect) were evaluated.
  • Identical search strategies were run weekly for two months in four services, with PubMed Cubby as baseline.
  • Evaluated ease of use, results frequency, MeSH utilization, search editing, and download capabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • MEDLINE SDI services do not consistently retrieve identical results, even with identical search strategies.
  • Significant variations exist among services regarding features and functionalities offered.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of MEDLINE SDI service impacts information retrieval consistency and feature availability.
  • Users should carefully consider service-specific performance and features for optimal information management.