Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

A Kinetic Fluorescence-based Ca2+ Mobilization Assay to Identify G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators
Published on: February 20, 2018
Comparison of assay technologies for a nuclear receptor assay screen reveals differences in the sets of identified
Xiang Wu1, J Fraser Glickman, Benjamin R Bowen
1Exelixis, South San Francisco, CA 94083-0511, USA. swu@exelixis.com
Abstract:
Many assay technologies currently exist to develop high-throughput screening assays, and the number of choices continues to increase. Results from a previous study comparing assay technologies in our laboratory do not support the common assumption that the same hits would be found regardless of which assay technology is used. To extend this investigation, a nuclear receptor antagonist assay was developed using 3 assay formats: AlphaScreen, time-resolved fluorescence (TRF), and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET). Compounds ( approximately 42000) from the Novartis library were evaluated in all 3 assay formats. A total of 128 compounds were evaluated in dose-response experiments, and 109 compounds were confirmed active from all 3 formats. The AlphaScreen, TRF, and TR-FRET assay technologies identified 104, 23, and 57 active compounds, respectively, with only 18 compounds active in all 3 assay formats. A total of 128 compounds were evaluated in a cell-based functional assay, and 35 compounds demonstrated activity in this cellular assay. Furthermore, 34, 11, and 16 hits that were originally identified in the dose-response experiment by AlphaScreen, TRF, and TR-FRET assay technologies, respectively, were functionally active. The results of the study indicated that AlphaScreen identified the greatest number of functional antagonists.
Insights
Different high-throughput screening assay technologies yield varying results for nuclear receptor antagonist discovery. AlphaScreen identified the most functional antagonists compared to time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET).
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- High-throughput screening (HTS) relies on diverse assay technologies for drug discovery.
- Previous studies suggest assay technology choice impacts hit identification.
- Assay format selection is critical for identifying biologically relevant compounds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of three assay technologies: AlphaScreen, time-resolved fluorescence (TRF), and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET).
- To evaluate the hit identification consistency across different assay formats for nuclear receptor antagonists.
- To determine which assay technology identifies the most functionally active compounds in a cell-based assay.
Main Methods:
- Developed a nuclear receptor antagonist assay using AlphaScreen, TRF, and TR-FRET formats.
- Screened approximately 42,000 compounds from the Novartis library across all three formats.
- Validated hits through dose-response experiments and a subsequent cell-based functional assay.
Main Results:
- AlphaScreen, TRF, and TR-FRET identified 104, 23, and 57 active compounds, respectively, with only 18 common hits.
- Of 128 compounds tested in a cell-based assay, 35 showed activity.
- AlphaScreen yielded the highest number of validated functional antagonists (34 hits).
Conclusions:
- Assay technology significantly influences hit identification in high-throughput screening.
- AlphaScreen demonstrated superior performance in identifying functional nuclear receptor antagonists compared to TRF and TR-FRET.
- Results underscore the importance of selecting appropriate assay technologies for effective drug discovery.
Related Concept Videos
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue.
Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Agonist
Agonists can bind to receptors in different ways. Some agonists bind directly to the receptor's active site, mimicking the endogenous ligand's action.
Spare Receptors
