Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
On being loud and proud: non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms
Matthew J Hornsey1, Louise Majkut, Deborah J Terry
1School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia. m.hornsey@psy.uq.edu.au
Abstract:
Most experiments on conformity have been conducted in relation to judgments of physical reality; surprisingly few papers have experimentally examined the influence of group norms on social issues with a moral component. In response to this, participants were told that they were either in a minority or in a majority relative to their university group in terms of their attitudes toward recognition of gay couples in law (Expt 1: N = 205) and a government apology to Aborigines (Expt 2: N = 110). In both experiments, it was found that participants who had a weak moral basis for their attitude conformed to the group norm on private behaviours. In contrast, those who had a strong moral basis for their attitude showed non-conformity on private behaviours and counter-conformity on public behaviours. Incidences of non-conformity and counter-conformity are discussed with reference to theory and research on normative influence.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Conformity
Groupthink
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Social Proof
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Deindividuation