Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision?

Hye-Won Lee1, Gordon E Legge, Alberto Ortiz

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. leeh@umn.edu

Vision Research
|October 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Lexical processing is slower in peripheral vision but equally accurate compared to central vision. This finding is crucial for understanding reading in visually impaired individuals with central vision loss.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Allopurinol and Chronic Kidney Disease.

The New England journal of medicine·2020
Same author

UWB-Based Self-Localization Strategies: A Novel ICP-Based Method and a Comparative Assessment for Noisy-Ranges-Prone Environments.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Views of Farmers and Industrial Entrepreneurs on The Iberian Pig Quality Standard: An In-Depth Interview Research Study.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2020
Same author

IL-17A as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Biomolecules·2020
Same author

Effect of Coffee Consumption on Renal Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.

Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation·2020
Same author

The effect of energy restriction on development and progression of chronic kidney disease: review of the current evidence.

The British journal of nutrition·2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Peripheral vision is vital for reading, especially for individuals with central vision impairment.
  • Understanding differences in lexical processing between central and peripheral vision is key for visual rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if lexical processing time courses differ between central and peripheral vision.
  • To determine if the quality of lexical processing varies between central and peripheral vision.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of word-frequency effects in lexical decisions across varying exposure durations (25-500 ms).
  • Comparison of frequency effects in central and peripheral vision at matched accuracy levels (0-100%).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant word-frequency effects emerged by 25-50 ms in central vision, but not until 100 ms in peripheral vision.
  • No differences in the pattern of word-frequency effects were observed between central and peripheral vision at equivalent performance levels.

Conclusions:

  • Lexical processing is demonstrably slower in peripheral vision compared to central vision.
  • The quality of lexical processing remains consistent across both central and peripheral visual fields.