Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Screening for hepatitis C in genito-urinary medicine clinics: a cost utility analysis
Ken Stein1, Kim Dalziel, Andrew Walker
1Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, University of Exeter, Southernhay East, Exeter EX1 1PQ, UK. ken.stein@exeter.ac.uk
Background/Aims:
To estimate the cost utility (cost per QALY) of screening for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in people attending genito-urinary medicine clinics in England.
Methods:
An epidemiological model of screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov chain model of treatment with combination therapy to estimate cost utility. Parameters for the model were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice.
Results:
The base case estimate was about pound 85,000 per QALY. Selective screening is more cost effective. If screening is restricted to only 20% or 10% of attenders, cost utility is estimated as pound 39,647 and pound 34,288 per QALY. If screening is restricted only to those with a history of injecting drug use, cost utility would be pound 27,138 per QALY. Estimates are particularly sensitive to acceptance rates for screening and treatment.
Conclusions:
Universal screening for HCV in GUM clinics is unlikely to be cost effective. There is limited evidence to support screening of people other than those with a history of injecting drug use and even this policy should be considered with some care and in the context of further research.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test