Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy

J Herman1, M Duda, M Lovecek

  • 12nd Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital Palacky University Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 775 20 Olomouc, Czech Republic. hermanj@post.cz

Hepato-Gastroenterology
|October 24, 2003
PubMed

Insights

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers shorter hospital stays and quicker return to work compared to open surgery for appendicitis. While surgery takes longer, the benefits of reduced recovery time and hospitalization outweigh the initial time investment.

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Appendicitis, both acute and chronic, is a common surgical condition.
  • Appendectomy remains the primary treatment for appendicitis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy.
  • To compare patient outcomes, including recovery time and hospitalization, for both surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 331 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute or chronic appendicitis.
  • Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic appendectomy (152 patients) and open appendectomy (179 patients).

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in significantly shorter hospital stays (5.0 vs. 8.3 days) and reduced work disablement periods (29.1 vs. 41.2 days).
  • The average surgical time for laparoscopic appendectomy was longer (53.7 minutes) compared to open appendectomy (43.6 minutes).
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy was more frequently performed in females (72%) than males (28%).

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy leads to faster patient recovery and shorter hospitalization.
  • Despite a longer operative time, the overall benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy, including earlier return to work, justify its use.
  • The increased initial cost of laparoscopic appendectomy is offset by reduced healthcare utilization and faster return to productivity.
Abstract