Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cryo-electron tomography reveals OmpB is required for the <i>Rickettsia</i> <i>parkeri</i> S-layer.

microPublication biology·2026
Same author

Lysozyme revisited: evaluating models of a reference protein in structural biology.

Current research in structural biology·2026
Same author

The distinct trimeric structure of the immunodominant chlamydial antigen Major Outer Membrane Protein.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Analysis of the heterogenous structural states of the hexameric ATPase PilU of the type IV pili from Vibrio cholerae.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

Crystallographic and EPR-based characterisation of Cu<sup>2+</sup>-binding to serum albumin: ATCUN coordination and additional sites.

Inorganic chemistry frontiers·2026
Same author

Analysis of the heterogenous structural states of the hexameric ATPase PilU of the Type IV pili from <i>Vibrio cholerae</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Crystallization and Structural Determination of an Enzyme:Substrate Complex by Serial Crystallography in a Versatile Microfluidic Chip
10:45

Crystallization and Structural Determination of an Enzyme:Substrate Complex by Serial Crystallography in a Versatile Microfluidic Chip

Published on: March 20, 2021

8.8K

Measurement errors and their consequences in protein crystallography.

Dominika Borek1, Wladek Minor, Zbyszek Otwinowski

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75390-9038, USA.

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|October 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Understanding measurement uncertainties is crucial for accurate structure determination. This study details error sources, minimization techniques, and practical sigma estimate calculations for experimental data.

More Related Videos

Characterization of Glycoproteins with the Immunoglobulin Fold by X-Ray Crystallography and Biophysical Techniques
08:58

Characterization of Glycoproteins with the Immunoglobulin Fold by X-Ray Crystallography and Biophysical Techniques

Published on: July 5, 2018

13.1K
Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction
09:35

Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction

Published on: July 21, 2017

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Crystallization and Structural Determination of an Enzyme:Substrate Complex by Serial Crystallography in a Versatile Microfluidic Chip
10:45

Crystallization and Structural Determination of an Enzyme:Substrate Complex by Serial Crystallography in a Versatile Microfluidic Chip

Published on: March 20, 2021

8.8K
Characterization of Glycoproteins with the Immunoglobulin Fold by X-Ray Crystallography and Biophysical Techniques
08:58

Characterization of Glycoproteins with the Immunoglobulin Fold by X-Ray Crystallography and Biophysical Techniques

Published on: July 5, 2018

13.1K
Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction
09:35

Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction

Published on: July 21, 2017

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate structure determination relies heavily on understanding and managing experimental errors.
  • Data quality is paramount, especially when it is borderline sufficient for detailed structural analysis.
  • Experimental uncertainties can significantly impact the reliability of structural models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of various measurement uncertainties on structure determination stages.
  • To describe sources and types of experimental errors in structural studies.
  • To discuss methods for minimizing the effects of these errors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of relative impacts of different measurement uncertainties.
  • Description of experimental error sources and types.
  • Discussion of error minimization strategies.
  • Presentation of practical sigma estimate calculations using DENZO and SCALEPACK.

Main Results:

  • Identified the relative influence of distinct measurement uncertainties across structure determination phases.
  • Characterized common sources and types of experimental errors.
  • Outlined effective strategies for mitigating the impact of experimental noise.
  • Provided concrete examples of sigma estimate calculations.

Conclusions:

  • Effective management of measurement uncertainties is vital for robust structure determination.
  • Knowledge of error sources and minimization techniques enhances data interpretation.
  • Practical computational tools aid in quantifying and addressing uncertainties.