Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Some recent randomized clinical trials in the management of atrial fibrillation
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary/Calgary Health Region, Room G009 Health Sciences Center, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1. dgwyse@ucalgary.ca
Abstract:
It is not possible to review all the recent randomized clinical trials in management of atrial fibrillation. The author has chosen to select a few that illustrate key points. "Immediate" or "early" recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion is an important part of inefficacy of drug therapy and more insight into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed. Two recent trials in which verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, and irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocking agent, added to a standard antiarrhythmic attenuated early recurrences of atrial fibrillation are of particular interest. Trials of drugs and pacing for maintenance of sinus rhythm continue to demonstrate only modest efficacy. Amiodarone, the most effective agent, is not markedly better and there are concerns about its adverse effect profile during long-term use. Other nonpharmacologic therapies have not yet been, but will need to be, evaluated in properly designed randomized clinical trials with clinically important end-points. The absence of a simple, highly effective treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm with few adverse effects has been part of the foundation for recent trials comparing the rate control strategy to the rhythm control strategy, particularly in the elderly patient. Six such trials have been completed and one is in progress. The data from these trials is quite consistent for the elderly patient with stroke risk factors and predominantly persistent atrial fibrillation: (1) any advantage for the rhythm control strategy remains unproven; (2) the rate control strategy has some clear advantages and should be considered more often as a primary approach in such patients; and (3) anticoagulation should not be discontinued in such high risk patients, even when it is felt that sinus rhythm has been maintained. Anticoagulation is under-utilized in this setting and alternatives to warfarin are badly needed. Trials in progress may be helpful in this regard. Finally, primary prevention of atrial fibrillation needs more attention. Recent randomized trials with trandolapril after myocardial infarction and physiologic pacing have given some insight into how this might be accomplished.
Insights
Recent trials suggest rate control is effective for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Anticoagulation is crucial for high-risk individuals, and research continues on better treatments and prevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Management of atrial fibrillation involves reviewing recent randomized clinical trials.
- Early recurrence after cardioversion highlights limitations in current drug therapies.
- Effective treatments for maintaining sinus rhythm with few side effects are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review key randomized clinical trials in atrial fibrillation management.
- To discuss the efficacy of rate control versus rhythm control strategies.
- To highlight the need for improved treatments and primary prevention of atrial fibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Review of selected randomized clinical trials on atrial fibrillation management.
- Analysis of drug therapies, including verapamil and irbesartan, for early recurrence.
- Evaluation of trials comparing rate control and rhythm control strategies, particularly in the elderly.
Main Results:
- Verapamil and irbesartan showed promise in attenuating early atrial fibrillation recurrences.
- Trials for maintaining sinus rhythm demonstrate modest efficacy; amiodarone has concerns.
- Rate control strategy shows advantages in elderly patients with stroke risk factors and persistent atrial fibrillation.
- Anticoagulation is vital in high-risk patients, even with maintained sinus rhythm.
Conclusions:
- The rate control strategy offers advantages and should be considered for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
- Rhythm control strategy's advantage remains unproven in this population.
- Anticoagulation is underutilized and essential for high-risk patients; alternatives to warfarin are needed.
- Primary prevention of atrial fibrillation requires further investigation and attention.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

