Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spouse controls in family case-control studies: a methodological consideration.

Bas A J Verhage1, Katja K H Aben, Huub Straatman

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Familial Cancer
|October 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informed choices: Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on high-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

Comprehensive genome-wide association study into multiple recurrence and progression risk in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Cancer genetics·2026
Same author

Surveillance patterns in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer across risk groups: a real-world analysis.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Addressing fear-related barriers in ACL rehabilitation: Sports physiotherapists' experiences and needs.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2026
Same author

Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types: using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Trends in histological subtypes of cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands from 1989 to 2023 - Influence of sunlight exposure and overdiagnosis.

Tumori·2026

Spouse controls in familial aggregation studies offer time and cost efficiencies. Even with assortative mating, spouse controls show a negligible effect on observed familial aggregation, making them a viable option.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Case-control studies are crucial for investigating familial aggregation of diseases.
  • Control group selection significantly impacts study validity and efficiency.
  • Spouse controls present a practical alternative to traditional population controls.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using spouse controls in familial aggregation studies.
  • To assess the potential impact of assortative mating on the reliability of spouse controls.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for control group selection in genetic epidemiology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on control group selection in epidemiological studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the theoretical pros and cons of employing spouse controls.
  • A simulation study to quantify the effect of assortative mating on familial aggregation estimates.

    • Main Results:

    • Spouse controls offer significant time and cost efficiencies due to accessibility and proxy data potential.
    • Higher response rates and reduced recall bias are anticipated with spouse controls compared to population controls.
    • Simulation results indicate that assortative mating, even when strongly correlated with risk factors, has a negligible impact on familial aggregation findings.

    Conclusions:

    • Spouse controls are a practical and efficient choice for case-control studies on familial aggregation.
    • The potential drawback of assortative mating is demonstrated to have minimal influence on study outcomes.
    • Researchers should consider spouse controls as a valuable option to enhance study feasibility and data quality.