Related Experiment Videos
Pterygium surgery with mitomycin C: how much sclera should be left bare?
Rahamim Avisar1, Dov Weinberger
1Cornea and External Eye Disease Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Golda Campus, Petah Tiqva, Israel. lavisar@bezeqint.net
Cornea
|October 25, 2003
Summary
Pterygium surgery outcomes vary based on conjunctiva coverage. Covering the sclera with conjunctiva or leaving a small bare area reduces recurrence and complications compared to leaving the entire sclera uncovered.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Surgical Techniques
- Ocular Surface Disease
Background:
- Pterygium is a common ocular condition requiring surgical intervention.
- The bare sclera technique is a standard surgical approach for pterygium excision.
- Postoperative management, including conjunctival coverage, may influence outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of different conjunctival coverage techniques after pterygium excision.
- To evaluate the effects on postoperative complications, cosmetic results, and pterygium recurrence.
- To determine the optimal surgical strategy for pterygium treatment.
Main Methods:
- A prospective comparative study involving 371 patients with primary advanced pterygium.
- Surgical groups included: conjunctiva sutured 2 mm from limbus (Group A), conjunctiva sutured at limbus (Group B), and bare sclera (Group C).
- Topical mitomycin C was applied post-excision; patients were followed for 26 months.
Main Results:
- Recurrence rates were 6.35% (Group A), 6.85% (Group B), and 25% (Group C).
- Complications like dellen occurred in 1.05% (A), 1.36% (B), and 25% (C).
- Cosmetic appearance was significantly better in Group A compared to Groups B and C.
Conclusions:
- Leaving the entire sclera bare after pterygium surgery significantly increases complication and recurrence risks.
- No significant difference in complications or recurrence was found between suturing conjunctiva 2 mm from the limbus versus covering the entire sclera.
- Suturing conjunctiva 2 mm from the limbus offers a more favorable cosmetic outcome without compromising safety or efficacy.