Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Effects of sentencing options and strict / lenient instructions on convicting suicide attempters
Lillian M Range1, Mitchell Berman, Tippins Embry
1Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA. L.Range@usm.edu
Abstract:
Sentence and strictness of instructions influence juries' willingness to convict. To see whether this result holds for suicide attempters, 240 undergraduates read jury instructions for a suicide attempt that varied sentence (jail term, fine, community service, or mandatory counseling) and instructions, voted guilty / not guilty, and rated their certainty and effectiveness. With sentences of 25 hours mandatory counseling, or strict instructions, more respondents voted guilty. Sentence did not impact certainty or effectiveness, but strictness enhanced certainty. Overall, respondents were neutral that convicting a suicide attempter would reduce future attempts. Consistent with terror management theory, present students were willing to punish regardless of whether they thought that the punishment was preventive.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Framing Effects
Fundamental Attribution Error
Electroconvulsive Therapy